Under s.113 shares in or securities of a company which are subject to a binding contract for sale are not relevant business property. The exception is where the shares or securities are sold for the purposes of reconstruction or amalgamation.
Shareholder directors of companies may enter into agreements between themselves to the effect that
The funds for the purchase may be provided by appropriate life
assurance policies.
Only most exceptionally does such an agreement constitute a
binding contract for sale within s.113. For the agreement to come
within s.113 it has to provide
When these requirements are satisfied, the agreement is called a
"buy and sell" agreement and it prevents the interest or shares
concerned qualifying for BR.
Disqualification does not however apply to shares or
securities in companies whose articles require the personal
representatives of a deceased shareholder to offer his shares for
sale to the company, other shareholders or directors - provided
there is no obligation on the offerees to buy. If however,
exceptionally, one side is bound to offer the shares or securities
and the other side is bound to purchase them, relief should (as
with 'buy and sell' agreements) be denied.
Property should not be regarded as disqualified under this
provision where the transfer of value is itself a sale for partial
consideration.
Valuers should notify the Appeals Team of any 'buy and sell'
agreement that comes to light during the course of negotiations.
Such sales are generally disclosed by the taxpayers.
However, in any case where it is not apparent whether a sale has or
has not taken place, and the value transferred appears likely to
exceed £250,000 before business relief, valuers should ask the
parties to state whether the transferred shares have been sold and,
if so, the date of the sale and when negotiations first commenced.
Where a sale pursuant to a buy and sell agreement is disclosed the
case should similarly be referred to SAV Appeals.
Subject to the above, unless there is some indication that a
contract for sale existed at the time of transfer, there is no
necessity to enquire in every case.
Occasionally agreements are seen where
or
Agreements of these types do not constitute contracts for sale. They do not prevent the interest from qualifying for BR by reason of s.113.
Lifetime transfers of relievable property are sometimes made
after a sale has been arranged or negotiated but shortly before the
binding contract is entered into. When this happens we need to
consider whether BR is available.
If, shortly after a transfer of unquoted shares, there is a
transaction (such as a flotation, a take-over or winding up of the
company) you should refer to SAV Appeals via your team leader.
Cases have come to light where a lifetime transfer of shares
was followed shortly afterwards by a sale of the company - the
transfer thereby being, in effect, a transfer of part of the
company's sale price. The agents/taxpayers nonetheless have argued
for a lower value per share than that represented by the sale price
and/or claimed business relief. They have argued that there was no
binding contract for sale, within s.113 IHTA 1984, at the time of
the transfer.
The following situations must be referred to SAV
Appeals:
If there was no binding contract for sale at the date of transfer/death Business Relief will be due but the position needs to be carefully checked.
If a sale takes place in the circumstances described above you should
| Additional Guidance: SVM150000 |