| Sums due from the company |
| Sums due to the company |
Because sums due from a company do not qualify for business
relief, you should check for the existence of sums due to the
deceased. If sums due to the deceased have been disclosed on the
Val 70, you should check that information against the position
disclosed in the accounts. If you are writing to the
taxpayer/agent, you should check that the sum disclosed as due to
the estate is the finally ascertained amount. If no sums are shown
on the Val 70 as due to the deceased but it is clear or possible on
the basis of the accounts that an amount is due to the estate, you
should either ascertain the precise facts from the taxpayer/agents
or (if you have no other reason to write to them) report the
position to the IHT caseworker, so that he/she can pursue the
matter.
As soon as you become aware of precise details of sums due
to a deceased, you should report the facts to the IHT caseworker.
If you are still ascertaining the precise facts, you should keep
the IHT caseworker informed of the position at a case conference.
Sometimes it may be claimed that the market value of a sum
due to the deceased from a company is less than its face value.
Such claims should always be dealt with by a valuer.
As stated in Chapter 19 of the IHT Manual at IHTM19000, the
value for tax of a debt payable on demand should normally be its
face value. Most directors’ loans to companies are made as a
result of informal arrangements and so would be repayable on
demand. If there are (unusually) special terms regarding repayment,
payment of interest etc, you should ascertain all the facts and ask
for copies of the document(s) evidencing the terms of the loan.
The usual argument for a debt having a value below face
value is not because of any special terms regarding repayment but
on the grounds that, because of its financial position, the company
is unable to repay the debt wholly or in part. The debt should be
valued on normal open market lines in accordance with s.160
Inheritance Taxes Act 1984 (what would someone pay to stand in the
creditor’s shoes?). You should also bear in mind s.166 IHTA
1984. This provides that, "In determining the value of a right to
receive a sum due under any obligation, it shall be assumed that
the obligation will be duly discharged, except if or to the extent
that recovery of the sum is impossible or not reasonably
practicable and has not become so by an act or omission of the
person to whom the sum is due." The section puts the burden of
proof on the person who alleges that a debt is worth less than its
face value.
In considering the value of debts which are claimed to have
a value less than their face value, you should take into account
the following:-
Sums due to the company from a deceased shareholder e.g. on loan account should be dealt with in a similar way. If you are writing to the taxpayer/agents, you should take up the question of the amount outstanding (and advise the IHT caseworker accordingly). If you are not writing to the taxpayer/agents, you should nonetheless consider the amount shown in the light of information available on file and comment as appropriate to the IHT caseworker.
| Additional Guidance: SVM150000 |