SE23802 - Pooled cars and vans: "de minimis" private use
Statement of Practice 2/1996
This Statement of practice mainly restated and explained our views on the implications of the second condition in SE23800. Private use which is not merely incidental to business use should in practice be ignored in deciding whether the vehicle comes under the protection of Section 159 where such private use is
- small in extent and infrequent, and
- consists of either or both of
- use limited to meeting the immediate need for transport in an emergency where the use of the vehicle is provided on compassionate grounds
- use for the purposes of the provision of another benefit which does not itself give rise to a tax charge where the use of the vehicle is merely incidental to the provision of that other benefit.
“Small in extent and infrequent” will generally be
not more than 5 per cent of the vehicle's annual mileage on
occasions which are neither regular nor protracted.
“Use meeting the immediate need for transport in an
emergency where the use of the vehicle is provided on compassionate
grounds” covers the kind of case where an employee is taken
ill at work or learns at work that a member of his or her family
has been involved in an accident. It does not cover the kind of
case where an employee's normal vehicle breaks down and the
“pool” vehicle is used as a substitute.
“Use for the purposes of the provision of another
benefit which does not itself give rise to a tax charge where the
use of the vehicle is merely incidental to the provision of that
other benefit” might apply in a number of different
situations. One example would be the use of a pool vehicle to take
employee-provided equipment such as a table tennis table to an
employer-provided sports facility. (Subject to various conditions,
employer provided recreational facilities do not give rise to a tax
charge.)
