The example here and on RPSM03104610 show where relevant benefit accrual as defined in paragraph 13, Schedule 36 FA 2004 has not occurred and consequently the individual has not lost enhanced protection.
Anthony had 30 years service on 5 April 2006. The scheme’s accrual rate was 1/60th for each year of service. His final pensionable salary, as defined on that day in the scheme documentation, was £240,000. He therefore registered £2.4 million (£120,000 x 20) for enhanced protection.
Anthony remained an active member of the pension scheme for another five years until he reached normal retirement age. By this time, his final pensionable salary had grown to £252,000 giving a pension of £147,000 (35/60 x £252,000). The value of the benefit crystallisation event is £2.94 million (£147,000 x 20).
The test for relevant benefit accrual is whether the value of the benefit crystallisation event is greater than the value of the appropriate limit.
The appropriate limit is the greater of
For the purposes of this example it has been assumed that
indexation at 5% compound gives a higher figure than the
recalculation.
The value of the appropriate limit is £3,063,076
(£2.4 million indexed at 5%) which is more than the value of
the benefit crystallisation event (£2.94 million). Therefore
relevant benefit accrual has not occurred and enhanced protection
is retained.
| Glossary ( RPSM20000000) |