PSI21.3.21 - Centralised Schemes:
Non-Associated Employers - Limits on Benefits - Pensions
-
(This archived guidance relates to HMRC discretionary
practice before the 6th April 2006. For current guidance on
Registered Pension Schemes see the Registered Pension Schemes
Manual)
[PN21.16-17]
Subject to
PSI21.2.7a centralised scheme for
associated employers may usually base benefits on
final remuneration at retirement and total group service. The
principle which governs benefits in centralised schemes for
non-associated employers is that the benefits
should not exceed the maximum approvable under an employer’s
own approved scheme (section 592(5) ICTA 88). In practice this
means that if an individual has been a member of the centralised
scheme in relation to service with more than one employer his/her
scheme benefits should not be greater than the maximum approvable
aggregate benefits payable had he/she been a member of a succession
of separate approved schemes for each of those employers viz other
than for the employment ending with retirement on the basis set out
in Section 3 of Part 13. This is known as the “successive
slice” method of calculating benefits. The successive slice
method is complicated and requires detailed records to be kept of
service and final remuneration for each period of scheme
membership. By concession we are content for schemes to provide
total benefits calculated by reference to total service with the
participating employers in question and final remuneration in
respect of the member’s last period of scheme employment. The
maximum benefit calculated in this way must not exceed 1/60th of
final remuneration for each year of relevant service up to a
maximum of 40 years to count. This limit should take into account
any benefits provided for the member under any other schemes of the
participating employers. The concession does not extend to the
calculation of lump sum retirement benefits which must be limited
to the successive slice method as explained in
PSI21.3.22.
Contact: | Date issued: | Next review: