The rules for the taxation of income of companies from overseas let property assessable under Schedule D Case V have, with the exception of the treatment of losses (see below) been aligned with the new Schedule A CT rules relating to the taxation of income from UK property. The changes came into effect as from 1 April 1998.
Income from ‘an overseas property business’ has the same meaning for companies as it has for individuals within the charge to IT.
Companies whose activities in relation to overseas property
amount to the carrying on of a trade within Case V Schedule D (that
is, a trade carried on wholly outside the UK) are subjected to the
rules of Case I Schedule D by ICTA88/S70 (2) and are unaffected by
these changes.
Where the company is in receipt of income from more than one
overseas property all those properties jointly constitute a single
overseas property business of that company. This is the same
approach which applies to the overseas property income of
individuals within the charge to IT. However, see below where there
is a claim to tax credit relief where the overseas income has
suffered foreign tax.
As part of the changes made by FA95, the taxable profits and losses of overseas let property were ring fenced for IT purposes. The effect was that:
The ring fencing of overseas property losses has been carried through to the new rules for companies but the ring fencing of overseas property profits has not. The effect is as follows:
but
Two other features of the loss provisions should be noted:
or
See ICTA88/S392A (5) as applied by ICTA88/S392B (2).
If the overseas income has suffered foreign tax and a claim to
tax credit relief is made, it will be necessary, for the purposes
of the source by source rule (see INTM161210) to identify the
amount of UK tax attributable to income from each particular
property. Where, therefore, tax credit relief is claimed separate
computations of profits and losses for each property will be
required. For the purposes of calculating tax credit relief, losses
should be deducted in the order most favourable to the company's
claim. Normally this will mean that losses should be allocated
first against the source which has suffered at the lowest rate of
foreign tax.
A company's flexibility in deciding how to allocate the
deduction set out in ICTA88/S797 (3), subject to the limitations in
respect of deficits on non-trading loan relationships set out at
ICTA88/S797 (3)(A) and (B), is unaffected by any of the
changes.