An easement is a right enjoyed by a person over land which they do not own. Landowners may receive payments for easements from electricity and gas concerns, or other similar undertakings, for easements in connection with cables pylons etc. on or over their land. The types of payment which may be made include:
a) Yearly payments for easements
b) Single lump sum payments
These are to be regarded as capital receipts and are
accordingly not chargeable to IT, though CGT liability may arise
(see CG72300 onwards).
c) Payments for disturbance
Payments for disturbance do not fall under (a) above, even if
they are payable under a wayleave agreement. Yearly payments within
ICTA88/S120 will be subject to IT.
Lump sum payments for disturbance will normally be of a capital nature (unless the payment is made to fill a hole in profits as opposed to compensate for damage).
Where there is expenditure on repairs of damage to land or
buildings etc. covered by the compensation payment, this will be an
allowable deduction either for Case I or Schedule A if the
compensation is chargeable to IT.
Where a lump sum payment is regarded as capital, any
corresponding expenditure should be excluded from the computations
under Case I or Schedule A.
The definition of ‘easement’ in ICTA88/S119 (3)
which is referred to in ICTA88/S120 (5) goes wider than the
ordinary meaning of the word ‘easement’. See the
comments of Uthwhat J at pages 329 and 330 of Mosley v George
Wimpey Ltd [1945] 27TC314.
It is not helpful to use a word that has a particular legal
meaning to describe something else. So in ITTOIA05 the term
‘wayleave’ is used to describe the right in respect of
which the rent is received. In practice this is how most of the
payments are usually described. But the generality of the words in
ICTA88/S119 (3) has not been lost.
The legislation is in ICTA88/S119 (rent etc payable in connection with mines, quarries and similar concerns) and ICTA88/S120 (rent etc payable in respect of electric line wayleaves).