OT22051 - Interest and Financing
Schedule 28AA ICTA transfer pricing rules
For accounting periods ending on or after 1st July 1999, FA 1998
introduced new transfer pricing rules, which are to be found in
ICTA 88/Sch 28AA. These rules are much more widely drawn than s770
ICTA, so that if any aspect of the loan (including the amount)
differs from arm’s length terms, the allowable interest may
be restricted. The rules also catch indirect borrowing arrangements
i.e. borrowing from an unconnected third party on the strength of a
guarantee given by an associate.
The new rules also make it clear that the arm's length
standard must apply to all cross-ring fence transactions even when
both the parties are UK resident. Furthermore the arm's length
standard will apply where the cross-ring fence transaction occurs
within a single company as well as where it occurs between separate
companies.
This means that where a company’s borrowings finance a
mixture of ring fence and non-ring fence assets, the latter should
be regarded as if they belonged to a separate business when it
comes to considering any restriction to arm’s length terms of
the interest deductible against ring fence profits.
Example
| Liabilities | Assets | ||
| Borrowings claimed as RF | 500 | Ring fence assets | 400 |
| Share capital | 500 | Non-ring fence assets (e.g. loans and investments) | 600 |
| 1000 | 1000* |
Considered as a whole the above company is not thinly
capitalised. But if the ring fence assets are treated as belonging
to a separate business, then that business is entirely financed by
debt, and the equity is actually negative. The application of an
arm’s length standard to the separate ring fence business
would require the ring fence assets to be funded partly by equity.
Accordingly, so far as the claimed ring fence debt exceeds what the
company could or would have borrowed on arm’s length terms if
it had held only its ring fence assets, the interest should be
disallowed against ring fence profits.
Schedule 28AA therefore provides a clear remedy against the
problems of excessive and unnecessary borrowing. It therefore must
be considered where the gearing is inappropriate and we have
concerns about thin capitalisation. It may also have to be
considered where there are other reasons for regarding the
borrowing as excessive and/or unnecessary.
Previous Page | Next Page | Top | Menu |
