OSFG01120 - Conditions for Certification Not Met

Paragraph 14 Schedule 27 ICTA 1988

From time to time a fund that sets out to operate so as to meet the conditions for certification as a distributing fund may find that it has not met one of the required conditions.

Loss of distributing fund status could have serious adverse effects upon investors in that fund, especially upon long term investors. Recognising that fact, the legislation gives the Board the power to disregard certain breaches of the investment restriction test (section 760(3)(a)) in very limited circumstances - in particular, where the Board are satisfied that

  • the failure occurred inadvertently, and
  • was remedied without unreasonable delay.

If a failure to meet the conditions has occurred and appears to come into this category, then we ask you to tell us, explain what has happened and tell us what steps have been taken to correct the situation.

If there has been any other failure to meet the conditions for approval by a fund that has, nevertheless, sought and intended to operate in a way that would obtain certification, it is also better to tell us, especially if you are applying for certification despite that breach.

If you are relying on any statutory provision other than Paragraph 14 to mitigate what otherwise might be seen as a breach of the conditions, again it is best to tell us.

The message is plain - if you are aware of a factor that might impact upon the fund’s ability to be certified as a distributing fund, tell us. Do not leave us to discover problems, as that will only lead to enquiries and will delay settlement of the fund’s application.

This does not mean that a fund that does not meet the relevant conditions cannot still be certified as if it had met those conditions. Simply that information provided fully, openly and without prompting is most helpful to us in considering whether or not to exercise the power under Paragraph 14.



Home | Main Contents | Manual Contents

Previous Page | Top