| 7 | Use Function MAINTAIN
HOUSEHOLD NOTES to check for any entries relating to the following
- The claimant having submitted a new claim
as part of a new household
- A Compliance termination having taken
place
- If there are any entries relating to the above
Then
- If there are no entries relating to the above, go to step
8
|
| 8 | Consider what changes
have occurred to increase or re-instate the award and generate the
high value payment. To do this, check each of the following
possible reasons
- An overlapping award following an amendment. A claim's
effective date has been backdated to overlap with a previous award
- An award has been reinstated or the period extended so that it
overlaps with a subsequently received claim’s award
For more possible reasons, see the
Examples
- A previously applied household end date
has been incorrectly removed. This means that a previously ended
award period has now been extended. Indications of this
include
- An entry of a household break up in Function MAINTAIN HOUSEHOLD
NOTES
- Evidence of either claimant making a new claim as part of a new
household
and the effective date of the new claim
corresponds with the date that an old award had previously been
ended
For further guidance see Note 1 below
- A single date award has now been
incorrectly re-instated for a longer period. Look for entries of
'Mismatch Bad Case' or 'Compliance Terminated' and the date the
claim was received in Function MAINTAIN HOUSEHOLD NOTES. These must
not be re-instated
For further guidance see Note 2 below
- If there is any evidence of the following
- A previously applied household end date having been incorrectly
removed
- An overlapping award where an award has been re-instated or the
period extended so that it overlaps with a subsequently received
claim's award
Or
- A single date award has been incorrectly re-instated for a
longer period
Then
Otherwise
Notes:
- To check for an existing household end date and
reason, use Function AMEND APPLICATION, selecting the 'Household
Details' option
- Mismatch cases terminated prior to April 2004
were reduced to a one-day award. This was because there was no
functionality for ‘Compliance Terminate’ at that time.
An entry in Function MAINTAIN HOUSEHOLD NOTES will indicate this
has been done. These cases must
not be re-instated
- The period of an award can be checked by using
the ‘From’ and ‘To’ dates in the Select
Award screen in Function VIEW AWARD
- Any of the above could result in an award
period being stopped and then re-instated for a longer period
|
| 9 | Check and compare the
award version which generated the high value payment against
previous award version(s) to identify what has caused the increased
or re-instated award
Note: By comparing the award with the previous
award version(s) you will see what has changed in terms of the
calculation To do this
- Enter the claimants NINO in the Key Entry
Data screen
- Click on the [OK] button and go to the
Award Summary screen
- Click on the award version you are
checking to highlight it
- To identify whether the award version you
are in is the one which generated the high value payment, click on
the [Payment Details] button. You will be taken to the Payment
Details screen
- Check whether an amount equal to the
cancelled payment is shown in the Amount column
Note: Where the payment is a combination of WTC
and CTC you will need to check each tax credit type separately
- Make a note of the total amount of the tax
credits award (CTC and WTC totals added together)
- Check the previous award version(s) to
confirm whether the difference in award total is greater than or
equal to the high value payment. If the difference in award total
is
- Not equal to or greater than the high value payment. This will
indicate that there is a payment or accounting problem, go to step
15
- Equal to or greater than the high value payment. Check each of
the award versions. To do this
- In the Payment Details screen, click on the [View Calculation]
button. You will be taken to the View Calculation screen. Make a
note of the date in the Award Version Date field
- Click on the [View Elements] button. You will be taken to the
View Elements screen. Make a note of all of the dates, elements and
entitlements listed on this screen
- Check the previous award version(s) and compare all of the
dates, elements and entitlements listed and make a note of the
dates in the Award Version Date fields
- Make a note of any changes in the elements you have
identified
Then
|
| 10 | Consider what changes
have occurred to increase or re-instate the award and generate the
high value payment, and check each of the following possible
reasons. The increase or re-instatement may have occurred due to
one or a combination of these reasons
- Income. Decreased income changes that had
not previously been taken into account for current year award
calculation purposes, but they are now. (Further guidance will be
given for this reason when you reach step 11)
- Although the dates had been correct in the History fields in
Function VIEW APPLICATION, for a previous claim version they had
not been taken into account in the corresponding award calculation.
However they are now on the more recent award version that is
relevant to the high value payment
- There has been an amendment to Full Time Education (FTE) which
has generated eligibility to the Young Person element creating an
increased award
Or
- Any other missing elements have been re-instated where
corrective action has been taken to re-instate elements of an
award
For example, a circumstance Include From date had previously
restricted the date from which that element was paid. Include From
dates are restricted where a
change of circumstances has not
been notified within 3 months which would result in the increase to
the maximum tax credits award. If a restriction has been applied
incorrectly and the effective date has been amended to re-instate
the full period of the element, this may have contributed to or
caused the high value payment
- Go to step 11 and continue your
checks
Notes:
- Consider whether a combination of amendments
may have caused or contributed towards the increased award
- If you are in any doubt about whether payments
should be issued, discuss any suspicious changes with your team
leader
|
| 11 | To check whether
decreased income changes have not previously been taken into
account for calculation purposes, but are now
- Enter the claimants NINO in the Key Entry
Data screen
- Select the 'All' checkbox
- Click on the [OK] button. You will be
taken to the Select Award screen
- Click on the award version that resulted
in the high value payment to highlight it
- Click on the [OK] button. You will be
taken to the Award Summary screen
- Click on the [View Calculation] button.
You will be taken to the View Calculation screen
- Click on the [View Income] button. You
will be taken to the View Income screen
- Make a note of the income used to
calculate the award in the Income used in Calculation box
- Make a note of which year’s income
has been used in the calculation. If the income used is current
year income, less the income increase amount, then note the CY
income shown above
- Return to the Award Summary screen
- Select ‘Navigation’ on the
toolbar menu
- Select Function VIEW APPLICATION from the
options available. You will be taken to the Application Summary
screen in Function VIEW APPLICATION
- Click on the [Continue] button until you
reach the Income screen
- In the Income screen, make a note of the
total of all the income shown on this screen for the year, which
you noted was used in the award calculation. If the claim is for a
joint household, add the total income for both claimant’s
together
- Compare the amount of income noted in
Function VIEW AWARD with the income noted in Function VIEW
APPLICATION
- If the amount noted in Function VIEW AWARD is less than the
amount noted in Function VIEW APPLICATION, make a note of the
details as you will need to refer to these later on in the process.
Go to step 12
- If the amount noted in Function VIEW AWARD is more than the
amount noted in Function VIEW APPLICATION, make a note of the
details as you will need to refer to these later on in the process.
Go to step 12
- If the amounts noted are the same. Return to Function VIEW
AWARD and check the previous award version with an issue date. Has
the income reduced?
- Yes, then this may have created or contributed towards the high
value payment. Go to step 12 and continue with your checks
- No, then the high value payment will not have been created due
to income. Go to step 12 and continue with your checks
Notes:
- If you are checking a payment which relates to
more than one tax year, you will need to repeat this step for each
year and make a separate note of each check
- You must compare the amounts of income using
Function VIEW AWARD and Function VIEW APPLICATION to ensure that
you are checking the correct claim version which created the award
version that generated the high value payment
|
| 12 | Check whether the high
value payment has been generated due to the claim having been
corrected and what had previously caused a problem. For example,
missing elements caused by a gap in work history, or children that
had not been included in the award
To do this
- Use Function VIEW APPLICATION
- Enter the claimants NINO in the Key Entry
Data screen
- Select the 'All' checkbox
- Click on the [OK] button. You will be
taken to the Select Application Version screen
Note: If you are taken to the Select Application
screen, this will mean there is more than one claim for this
claimant. For example, cases where a household breakdown has
occurred and the claimant has re-applied. If you are taken to the
Select Application screen, click on the claim(s) affected by the
high value payment to highlight it and then click on the [OK]
button. You will then be taken to the Select Application Version
screen
- Click on the latest version to highlight
it
- Click on the [OK] button. You will be
taken to the Application Summary screen
Note: If an information signal appears, click on
the [OK] button
- Click on the [VH] button. You will be
taken to the View Application History screen for Applicant 1
- Click on the [Versions] button. You will
be taken to the Select Application Version screen
Note: Use the notes you have already made of the
‘version dated’ date which relates to the claim version
for the high value payment, and the claim version which relates to
the previous issued award to check the claim versions
- Click on the appropriate version which
relates to the high value payment to highlight it
- Select 'History' on the toolbar menu. You
will be taken to the History screen
- Check all of the signals history and note
all the details for claimant 1, claimant 2 and any children, if
appropriate
- Click on the [Cancel] button. You will be
taken back to the Application Summary screen
- Click on the [Versions] button. You will
be taken to the Select Application Version screen
- Click on the version which relates to the
previous issued award to highlight it
- Select 'History' on the toolbar menu. You
will be taken to the History screen
- Check the signals history and note all
details for claimant 1, claimant 2 and any children, if
appropriate
- Repeat this action until you identify a
change which created or contributed to the high value payment, or
until you reach the initial version
- When you have recorded all the necessary
details in history, click on the [Cancel] button and return to the
Function Menu
- Use Function MAINTAIN HOUSEHOLD NOTES to
check all the entries to confirm the details you have established
when checking history
- Note any relevant information, for
example, changes to jobs, hours or child details. This may provide
details as to why the versions changed
- If you notice any incorrect details, for
example, a gap of under 7 days, make a note of the details as
corrective action will be required, when you reach step 16 of this
guidance
Then
Notes:
- You must ensure that all signals are checked as
there may have been more than one error which originally
occurred
- Some dates may have been populated by the
computer. For example, the Include From date could have been
populated 3 months before the date a change was actually made on
the computer. You can check this by looking at the version
date
|
| 13 | From all the checks you
have made, have you determined that the claim details are incorrect
- If the claim details are correct, go to
step 18
- If the claim details are correct, but you
have established that the computer is not recognising a signal, for
example, a household end date is entered but payments are
continuing past this point, go to step 15
- If the claim details are incorrect, have
you determined that the income details within the corresponding
claim version are not being used by the computer to calculate the
award
|
| 14 | Refer the case by email
with the following details to your Technical Advice Line Liaison
Officer (TALLO)
Title: High Value Payment Checks – Possible System Problem
Body of Message
NINO – (Insert NINO here)
This case has been checked as part of the High Value Payment
checks and it appears that the award has been calculated using
incorrect income figures. Case referred for investigation
Note: Your TALLO will forward the case to the Technical
Advice Line (TAL) for them to investigate and refer to Information
Management Solutions (IMS)
Then
- Are there any other incorrect details you have identified?
- Yes, go to step 16 to take corrective action
- No, was the income amount noted in Function VIEW AWARD more
than the amount noted in Function AMEND APPLICATION?
- No, go to step 19
- Yes, go to step 18
|
| 16 | From the information you
have checked you should be able to establish why the claim is
incorrect. Follow the appropriate guidance in the NTC manual to
apply the necessary corrections, for example, where a change of
circumstances was not applied correctly
- To correct a child's details where for
example, there is a duplicate child, a fictitious child or to
correct a child’s date of birth, follow the guidance in
Child / Childcare
Changes
- To correct a child start and / or end date
on the claim or if the child's details held on the claim are
incorrect, for example, you have identified an incorrect child
responsibility start date, follow the guidance in
Correcting Child Signals
History Start And End Dates
- To correct other start and / or end dates
in history other than child signals that are incorrect, for
example, where you have identified an incorrect IS (Income Support)
signal start date, follow the guidance in
Correcting Signals History
Start And End Dates
- To correct details that should not have
been on the computer in the first place, for example, where a start
date and include date in the disabled signal has been recorded but
the claimant has never been registered as disabled, follow the
guidance in
Deleting Details That
Should Not Be On The Computer
- To correct work history details that have
been incorrectly actioned when the change of circumstances was
first applied, for example, where you have identified an incorrect
gap in work history, follow the relevant guidance in
Work / Benefit
Changes
- Where the computer is not recognising a
signal, for example, a household end date is entered but payments
are continuing past this point, do not re-issue the payment,
forward details of the case to your Technical Liaison Officer (TLO)
to raise a vantive with Business Help Desk (BHD)
- Where you have established that the change
in award totals are not great enough to have created the high value
payment, forward details of the case to your TLO to raise a vantive
with BHD
- Is contact with the claimant necessary in
order to undertake the corrective action?
Note: Corrective action can be undertaken on a
ceased claim, for example, where incorrect history details has been
established, however the household end date must
not be removed unless it is established that this
is incorrect
|