To validate high value payments, consider steps 1 - 23 below.
The guide is presented as follows
| 10 | Use Function MAINTAIN
HOUSEHOLD NOTES and check for any entries relating to the following
- The claimant having submitted a new claim
as part of a new household
- A Compliance Termination having taken
place
- If there are any entries relating to the above
Then
- If there are no entries relating to the above, go to step
11
|
| 11 | Consider what changes
have occurred to increase or re-instate the award and generate the
high value payment. To do this, check each of the following
possible reasons
- An overlapping award following an
amendment. A claim’s effective date has been backdated to
overlap with a previous award
- An award has been reinstated or the period
extended so that it overlaps with a subsequently received
claim’s award
For more possible reasons see the
Examples
- A previously applied Household End date
has been incorrectly removed. This means that a previously ended
award period has now been extended. Indications of this
include
- An entry of a household break up in Function MAINTAIN HOUSEHOLD
NOTES
- Evidence of either claimant making a new claim as part of a new
household
and the effective date of the new claim
corresponds with the date that an old award had previously been
ended
For further guidance see Note 1 below
- A single date award has now been incorrectly re-instated for a
longer period. Look for entries of ’Mismatch Bad Case’
or ’Compliance Terminated’ and the date the claim was
received in Function MAINTAIN HOUSEHOLD NOTES. These must
not be reinstated
For further guidance see Note 2 below
- If there is any evidence of the following
- A previously applied Household End date having been incorrectly
removed
- An overlapping award where an award has been reinstated or the
period extended so that it overlaps with a subsequently received
claim’s award
Or
- A single date award has been incorrectly re-instated for a
longer period
Then
Otherwise
Notes:
- To check for an existing household end date and
reason, use Function AMEND APPLICATION, selecting the
‘Household Details’ option
- Mismatch cases terminated prior to April 2004
were reduced to a one-day award. This was because there was no
functionality for ’Compliance Terminate’ at that time.
An entry in Function MAINTAIN HOUSEHOLD NOTES will indicate this
has been done. These cases must
not be reinstated
- The period of an award can be checked by using
the ‘From’ and ‘To’ dates in the Select
Award screen in Function VIEW AWARD
- Any of the above could result in an award
period being ceased and then re-instated for a longer period
|
| 12 | Check and compare the
award version which generated the high value payment against
previous award version(s) to identify what has caused the increased
or re-instated award
Note: By comparing the award with the previous
awards version(s) you will see what has changed in terms of the
calculation
To do this
- Enter the claimant’s NINO in the Key
Entry Data screen
- Click the [OK] button and go to the Award
Summary screen
- Click on the award version you are want to
highlight it
- To identify whether the award version you
are in is the one which generated the high value payment
- Click on the [Payment Details] button. You will be taken to the
Payment Details screen
- Check whether an amount equal to the high
value payment is shown in the Amount Column
Note: Where the payment is a combination of WTC
and CTC you will need to check each tax credit type separately
- Make a note of the total amount of the tax
credit award (CTC and WTC totals added together)
- Check the previous award version(s) to
confirm whether the difference in award total is greater than or
equal to the high value payment. If the difference in award total
is
- Not equal to or greater than the high value payment, this will
indicate that there is a payment or accounting problem, go to step
19
- Equal to or greater than the high value payment, check each of
the award versions. To do this
- In the Payment Details screen, click on the [View Calculation]
button. You will be taken to the View Calculation screen. Make a
note of the date in the Award Version Date field
- Click on the [View Elements] button. You will be taken to the
View Elements screen. Make a note of all the dates, elements and
entitlements listed on this screen
- Check the previous award version(s) and compare all of the
dates, elements and entitlement listed and make a note of the dates
in the Award Version Date fields
- Make a note of any changes in elements you have identified
Then
|
| 13 | Consider what changes
have occurred to increase or re-instate the award and generate the
high value payment, and check each of the following possible
reasons. The increase or re-instatement may have occurred due to
one or a combination of these reasons
- Income. Decreased income changes had not
previously been taken into account for current year award
calculation purposes, but are now. (Further guidance will be given
for this reason when you reach step 14)
- Although the dates had been correct in Function VIEW
APPLICATION ‘History’ fields for a previous claim
version they had not been taken into account in the corresponding
award calculation. However they now are on the more recent award
version that is relevant to the high value payment
- There has been an amendment to Full Time Education (FTE) which
has generated eligibility to the Young Person element creating an
increased award
- Any other missing elements have been reinstated, where
corrective action has been taken to re-instate elements of an
award.
For example, a circumstance Include From date had previously
restricted the date from which that element was paid. Include From
dates are restricted where a
change of circumstances has not
been notified within 3 months which would result in the increase to
the maximum tax credits award. If a restriction has been applied
incorrectly and the effective date has been amended to re-instate
the full period of the element, this may have contributed to or
caused the high value payment
- Go to step 14 and continue your
checks
Notes:
- Consider whether a combination of amendments
may have caused or contributed towards the increased award
- If you are in any doubt about whether payments
should be issued, discuss any suspicious changes with your team
leader
|
| 14 | To check whether
decreased income changes have not previously been taken into
account for calculation purposes but now are
- Enter the claimant’s NINO in the Key
Entry Data screen
- Select the ‘All’ checkbox
- Click the [OK] button, you will be taken
to the Select Award screen
- Click on the award version that resulted
in the high value payment to highlight it
- Click on the [OK] button. You will be
taken to the Award Summary screen
- Click on the [View Calculation] button.
You will be taken to the View Calculation screen
- Click on the [View Income] button, you
will be taken to the View Income screen
- Make a note of the income used to
calculate the award in the Income used in Calculation box
- Make a note of which year’s income
has been used in the calculation. If the income used is current
year income, less the income increase amount, then note the CY
income shown above
- Return to the Award Summary screen
- Select ‘Navigation’ on the
toolbar menu
- Select Function VIEW APPLICATION from the
options available. You will be taken to the Application Summary
screen in Function VIEW APPLICATION
- Click on the [Continue] button until you
reach the Income screen
- In the Income screen, make a note of the
total of all the income shown on this screen for the year, which
you noted was used in the award calculation. If the claim is for a
joint household, add the total income for both claimants
together
- Compare the amount of income noted in
Function VIEW AWARD with the income noted in Function VIEW
APPLICATION
- If the amount noted in Function VIEW AWARD is less than the
amount noted in Function VIEW APPLICATION, make a note of the
details as you will need to refer to these later on in the process,
go to step 15
- If the amount noted in Function VIEW AWARD is more than the
amount noted in Function VIEW APPLICATION, make a note of the
details as you will need to refer to these later on in the process,
go to step 15
- If the amounts noted are the same. Return to Function VIEW
AWARD and check the previous award version with an issue date. Has
the income reduced?
- Yes, than this may have correctly created or contributed
towards the high value payment. Go to step 15 and continue your
checks
- No, then the high value payment will not have been generated
due to income. Go to step 15 and continue your checks
Notes
- If you are checking payments which relate to
more than one tax year, you will need to repeat this step for each
year, make a separate note of each check
- You must compare the amounts of income using
Function VIEW AWARD and Function VIEW APPLICATION to ensure that
you are checking the correct claim version which created the award
version that generated the high value payments
|
| 15 | Check whether the high
value payment has been generated due to the claim having been
corrected and what had previously caused a problem. For example,
missing elements caused by a gap in work history, or children that
had not been included in the award
- Use Function VIEW APPLICATION
- Enter the claimant’s NINO in the Key
Entry Details screen
- Select the ‘All’ checkbox
- Click on the [OK] button. You will be
taken to the Select Application Version screen
Note: If you are taken to the Select Application
screen, this will mean there is more than one claim for this
claimant. For example, cases where a household breakdown has
occurred and the claimant has re-applied. If you are taken to the
Select Application screen,, select the claim(s) affected by the
high value payment. You will then be taken to the Select
Application Version screen
- Click on the latest version to highlight
it
- Click on the [OK] button. You will be
taken to the Application Summary screen
Note: If an information signal appears, click on
the [OK] button
- Click on the [VH] button. You will be
taken to the View Application History screen for Applicant 1
- Click on the [Versions] button. You will
be taken to the Select Application Version screen
Note: Use the notes you have already made of the
‘version dated’ date which relates to the claim version
for the high value payment, and the claim version which relates to
the previous issued award to check the claim versions
- Click on the appropriate version which
relates to the high value payment to highlight it
- Select ‘History’ on the
toolbar menu. You will be taken to the History screen
- Check all of the signals history and note
all details for claimant 1, claimant 2 and any children, if
appropriate
- Click on the [Cancel] button. You will be
taken back to the Application Summary screen
- Click the [Versions] button. You will be
taken to the Select Application Version screen
- Click on the version which relates to the
previous issued award to highlight it
- Select ‘History’ on the
toolbar menu. You will be taken to the History screen
- Check the signals history and note all
details for claimant 1, claimant 2 and any children, if
appropriate
- Repeat this action until you identify a
change which created or contributed to the high value payment, or
until you reach the initial version
- When you have recorded all the necessary
details in the History screen, click on the [Cancel] button and
return to the Function Menu
- Use Function MAINTAIN HOUSEHOLD NOTES to
check all the entries to confirm the details that you have
established when checking history
- Note any relevant information, for example, changes to jobs,
hours or child details. This may provide details as to why the
versions changed
- If you notice any incorrect details, for example a gap of under
7 days, make a note of the details as corrective action will be
required when you reach step 20 of this guidance
Then
Notes You must ensure that all signals are checked
as there may have been more than one error which originally
occurred Some dates may have been populated by the system, for
example, the Include From date could have been populated 3 months
before the date a change was actually made on the computer. You can
check this by looking at the version date
|
| 16 | From the checks you have
made, have you determined that the claim details are incorrect?
- If the claim details are correct, are you
working this guidance from a
- Fax / WAM referral, go to step 23
- Spreadsheet entry, go to step 22
- If the claim details are incorrect but you
have established that the change in award total is not great enough
to have created the high value payment, are you working this
guidance from a
- Fax / WAM referral, go to step 20
- Spreadsheet entry, if the check has been made
- Pre 10.00 am, go to step 18
- Post 10.00 am, go to step 20
- If the claim details are correct but you
have established that the computer is not recognising a signal, for
example a household end date is entered but payments are continuing
past this point, are you working this guidance from a
- Fax / WAM referral, go to step 20
- Spreadsheet entry. If the check has been made
- Pre 10.00 am, go to step 18
- Post 10.00 am, go to step 20
- If the claim is incorrect, have you
discovered whether the income details within the corresponding
claim version are not being used by the computer to calculate the
award?
- No, and you are you working this guidance from a fax / WAM
referral, go to step 19
- No and you are working this guidance from a spreadsheet entry,
if the check been made
- Pre 10.00 am, go to step 18
- Post 10.00 am, go to step 20
|
| 17 | Send an e-mail to
IR:BS FYLDE:NTC SERV MAN with the following
details
Note: Only details regarding the income that is
not being recognised by the computer should be forwarded by e-mail.
Requests to action any other type of corrective requirement cannot
be accepted using this route
Title: High Value Payment Checks – Possible System Problem
Body of message
NINO – [Insert here]
This case has been checked as part of the High Value Payment
checks and it appears that the award has been calculated using
incorrect income figures. Case referred for your investigation
- Then, are there any other incorrect
details you have discovered? If
- Yes, go to step 20 to take corrective action
- No, and you are working guidance from a fax / WAM referral, go
to step 23
- No, and you are working guidance from a spreadsheet entry, go
to step 22
|
| 20 | From the information you
have checked you should have been able to establish why the claim
is incorrectFollow the appropriate guidance in the NTC manual to
apply the necessary corrections, for example, where a change of
circumstance was not applied correctly
- To correct child details where for
example, there is a duplicate child / fictitious child or to
correct a child’s date of birth, follow the guidance in
Child / Childcare
Changes
- To correct a child start / end date on the
tax credits claim or if child details held on the tax credits claim
are incorrect. For example, you have identified an incorrect child
responsibility start date, follow the guidance in
Correcting Child Signals
History Start And End Dates
- To correct other start / end dates in
history other than child signals that are incorrect. For example,
you have identified an incorrect IS (Income support) signal start
date, follow the guidance in
Correcting Signals History
Start And End Dates
- To correct details that should not have
been on the computer in the first place, for example, where a Start
date and include date in the disabled signal has been recorded, but
the claimant has never been registered as disabled, follow the
guidance in
Deleting Details That
Should Not Be On The Computer
- To correct work history details that have
been incorrectly actioned when the change of circumstances was
first applied, for example, you have identified an incorrect gap in
work history follow the relevant guidance in
Work / Benefit
Changes
- Where the system is not recognising a
signal, for example a household end date is entered but payments
are continuing past this point, forward details of the case to your
Technical Liaison Officer (TLO) to raise a vantive with Business
Help Desk (BHD)
- Where you have established that the change
in award total are not great enough to have created the high value
payment, forward details of the case to your TLO to raise a vantive
with BHD
- Is contact with the claimant necessary in
order to undertake corrective action?
- No, have you reached this step through working
- A spreadsheet entry, go to step 22
- A fax / WAM referral, go to step 23
Note: Corrective action can be undertaken
regarding a ceased claim for example where incorrect history
details have been established, however the household end date must
not be removed unless it is established that this
is incorrect
|