‘Salary sacrifices’ have been a feature associated with pension schemes for many years. The employee agrees with their employer to take a cut in earnings and the employer agrees to contribute that amount as premiums to a pension fund. No NICs liability arises if the employee enters into a formal agreement with the employer to give up their right to that part of their earnings and to vary their terms and conditions of employment accordingly.
Although in the past the main use of salary sacrifices related to the giving up of rights to cash remuneration in return for contributions to pension schemes, the position has now changed. Such arrangements now apply to a variety of situations where an employee gives up a right to future cash remuneration in return for a payment in kind.
Example
An employee is entitled to an annual salary of £35,000.
They agree to a salary sacrifice to move in the future to an annual remuneration package comprised of £33,000 cash and £2,000 in vouchers which can be exchanged for childcare.
The childcare vouchers will not attract a liability for NICs as they are specifically excluded by regulation.
NICs will be due only on the £33,000 cash.
(See
NIM02445 for information regarding the
exemption in respect of childcare vouchers and
NIM16110 for information regarding the
exemption for provided childcare.)
In order for a salary sacrifice to be successful:
See EIM42750-42790 for detailed guidance regarding salary
sacrifice arrangements.
General guidance in respect of salary sacrifice arrangements
has been published on the HMRC website.
You should consider issuing a copy of that guidance to any
employer or employee who enquires about salary sacrifice.
A list of Frequently Asked Questions is also maintained on
the website. The link below will take you to the relevant pages.
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/specialist/salary_sacrifice.htm
The guidance at EIM42755 explains the principle established in
the case of Heaton v Bell. Basically, this case gave rise to the
principle that if an employee can give up a benefit at any time and
revert to the original higher cash remuneration then the benefit is
taxable under section 62 ITEPA because it can be converted into
money.
This principle has no relevance for NICs. When considering
NICs liability you must always have regard to what the employee
actually receives and assess liability for NICs accordingly. This
means that if an employee
We have recently become aware of a new scheme (the Smart Pensions Scheme) which involves the employee in giving up cash remuneration in return for the employer taking over responsibility for making the contributions to the pension scheme which were originally made by the employee. See NIM02331for further information regarding this scheme.