The general NICs treatment of payments made in respect of staff suggestion awards is provided at NIM02350, including the conditions which must be satisfied for an award to be exempt from either Class 1 or Class 1A NICs.
Before 6 April 2003, section 10(9) SSCBA 1992 and regulation
40(7)(g) of the SS(C)R 2001 excepted emoluments not chargeable to
income tax under Schedule E by virtue of ESCA57. ESCA57 excepted
from income tax, awards made by an employer to an employee under a
Staff Suggestion Scheme provided certain conditions were satisfied.
For more information about ESCA57 see SE06600.
If the conditions are not satisfied, the awards will be
emoluments chargeable to income under Schedule E. In these
circumstances section 10(1)(a) of the SSCBA 1992 will be satisfied.
If the other conditions listed in
NIM13021 are satisfied, Class 1A NICs
liability will arise.
If the conditions of the tax exemption are satisfied but the
amounts paid exceed the permitted maximum (SE06600), the amounts
above the permitted maximum that can be awarded free of income tax,
will be emoluments chargeable to income under Schedule E. In these
circumstances section 10(1)(a) of the SSCBA 1992 will be satisfied.
If the other conditions listed in
NIM13021 are satisfied Class 1A NICs
liability will arise.
From 6 April 2003, ESCA57 became obsolete because it is now
covered by the enactment of sections 321 and 322 of ITEPA 2003, see
EIM06600. Regulation 40(7)(g) of the SSCR 2001 was repealed.
Sections 321 and 322 of ITEPA 2003 exempt from income tax, certain
awards or financial benefits made to an employee if the conditions
in those sections are satisfied. If the conditions are satisfied
and the awards do not exceed the permitted maximum that can be paid
or provided free of tax, there can be no general earnings
chargeable to income tax so section 10(1)(a) of the SSCBA 1992.
Therefore, there will be no Class 1A NICs liability.
If the conditions are not satisfied, the awards will be
general earnings chargeable to income under ITEPA 2003. In these
circumstances section 10(1)(a) of the SSCBA 1992 will be satisfied.
If the other conditions listed in
NIM13021 are satisfied Class 1A NICs
liability will arise.
If the conditions are satisfied but the amounts paid exceed
the permitted maximum (EIM06600) the amounts above the permitted
maximum that can be awarded free of income tax, will be general
earnings chargeable to income under ITEPA 2003. In these
circumstances section 10(1)(a) of the SSCBA 1992 will be satisfied.
If the other conditions listed in
NIM13021 are satisfied Class 1A NICs
liability will arise on the amounts above the permitted
maximum.
Where a staff suggestion award is provided in more than one
form, for example partially in cash and partially by means of
benefits, the various elements making up the staff suggestion award
must be added together to determine whether the permitted maximum
is exceeded. Where the permitted maximum is exceeded, the class of
NICs due on that amount which exceeds the prescribed maximum will
depend upon how the staff suggestion is made up.
Where an award comprises of different elements
Where a staff suggestion award exceeds the permitted maximum that can be paid free of income tax, if what is provided is not disregarded from earnings under paragraph 1 of Part 2 of Schedule 3 to the SSCR 2001 (the payment in kind disregard - see NIM02020), section 10(1)(c) of the SSCBA 1992 will not be satisfied (see NIM13090). In these circumstances Class 1A NICs are not due, but the amount of the earnings should be added to gross pay when calculating Class 1 NICs liability.