Section 200A of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (ICTA
1988) was introduced from 6 April 1995 to exclude personal
incidental expenses (PIEs) from tax where they satisfy certain
conditions. See
NIM06015 for guidance on what a PIE is,
and SE02700 for further information regarding section 200A ICTA
1988.
From 18 July 1995 legislation (regulation 19(1)(s)) was
introduced into the Social Security (Contributions) Regulations
1979 to exclude from Class 1 NICs any PIEs which were able to be
excluded from tax by virtue of section 200A ICTA.
As the exclusion was introduced only from 18 July 1995 any
payment of PIEs made before that date would attract a liability for
Class 1 NICs. It was decided at the time, however, that if arrears
arising in the period between 6 April 1995 and 17 July 1995 were
discovered then they would not be pursued. This was to align the
NICs practice with the tax treatment from 6 April 1995.
With effect from 6 April 1995, therefore, NICs are not due in
respect of PIEs which satisfy the conditions in section 200A for
tax exemption.
The NIC exclusion is only applicable if the PIEs are paid within prescribed limits. The limit consists of a prescribed maximum. This is:
Employees are not required to produce receipts for any amount
claimed within the prescribed limits and employers are not required
to ask for them.
The prescribed limits must be strictly adhered to and any
payment in excess of them will cause the whole amount of the PIE to
be subject to Class 1 NICs.
Example 1:
An employee spends 1 night away from home on business in the UK.
The employee is paid £6 to cover PIEs.
The amount paid exceeds the prescribed limit of £5.
The whole £6 is liable for Class 1 NICs.
The only exception to the nightly prescribed maximum is where:
Example 2:
An employee spends 4 consecutive nights away from home on business in the UK.
They claim £5, £5, £6 and £4 in respect of PIEs.
The amount claimed for the third night is above the £5 limit but the total claimed over the 4 nights is within the limit.
No NICs are payable.
If the aggregate exceeds the prescribed limit for the number of days involved, then the whole sum will be liable for NICs.
Example 3:
If the total for the 4 days in Example 2 had been £22 then the whole sum would have been liable for NICs.
The aggregation rule can apply only to an unbroken run of
consecutive nights away. All consecutive nights must be taken
together in determining whether the exclusion applies. For example,
a period of 5 consecutive nights cannot be broken up into 4 nights
plus one stand alone night.
See
NIM06025 for information regarding the
exclusion from 6 April 2001 and NIM06026 for information regarding
the position from 6 April 2004.
NIM06030 provides guidance on the
evidence required and this is applicable to all periods from April
1995.