IPTM7015 - Scope: group life policies:
what constitutes a group life policy?
Group life policies are typically used to provide death cover
for groups of individuals ranging from couples and families through
to trade union members, groups of employees and large professional
partnerships. They are not normally used to provide investment
returns. Whether a policy which covers more than one life is a
group policy or really a series of individual policies is a
contractual question and a number of factors need to be considered
to determine the position. However, given the exclusion from the
chargeable event rules of a wide category of protection-only group
life policies this question is less important than it was.
Is the policy a group policy or a series of individual
policies?
In 1992, the Association of British Insurers issued guidance to
members on this question, following advice from the Inland Revenue
and this paragraph repeats that guidance. Any interconnection
between insurances would probably indicate a single group policy
contract rather than a series of individual contracts. Specific
factors which would indicate that a policy is not a group policy
are where:
- there was individual rating of risk such
that there was no cross-subsidy between scheme members. The
application of free cover limits does not necessarily imply that
rating is on anything other than an individual basis provided
similar non-medical limits are applied generally. This would mean
that individuals are able to secure insurances of the same type by
reference to the same non-medical limits. By contrast, if a
particular master/subordinate group policy is written by reference
to non-medical limits which are generally not available, such as
better non-medical limits, that is indicative of some
interdependence between the policies and suggests a single
contract
- the insurance is of a type which might be
effected by an individual independently of any group
arrangement
- membership of the scheme is not
compulsory. Membership should also be open to all within the
relevant class or category. In the case of schemes for employees,
it is clearer if membership is open to all within the relevant
class or category. In the case of schemes for employees, it is
clearer if membership is open to all employees, although it is
probably possible to make a case for membership being open to a
particular class or category of employee
- the insured benefits are independent of
benefits under any other contract
- the terms of the contract or options under
the contract can be exercised independently of the terms of any
other contract. It must be possible to terminate some contracts
without having any effect or bearing on other contracts. In the
extreme, termination of all but one contract should have no effect
on the ability to continue the one remaining insurance without any
implications for premium rates, benefits, options and the like
- the member pays the premiums under the
contract or is chargeable to tax on the premiums paid
- dependants of the member and the like are
entitled to receipt of the benefits for which insurance is provided
for the member.