INTM468000 - Giving transfer pricing advice to taxpayers
Requests for advice on the operation of the transfer pricing rules
(The text below replaces the original version of this paragraph,
which in turn was based on an internal IR memo TS115/99 which
appeared in December 1999. This primarily concerned agreements
utilising Code of Practice 10 on service provision within a group
of companies, where Inspectors were able to accept that a cost-plus
arrangement was appropriate.
With the advent of the guidance on Centrally Provided
Services which appeared in 2004 (
INTM464055) this guidance became
superseded.)
This guidance is not intended to cover:
- Treaty Clearances: claims by non residents to receive royalties or interest at the treaty rate of withholding tax or implementing EU Interest and Royalties Directive.[ INTM400010 onwards]
- Financial Transfer Pricing issues: CT & VAT, International CT continues to offer advice about the tax consequences of proposed financing arrangements [ INTM540000 onwards]
Inspectors are sometimes approached by businesses seeking advice
or “comfort” about their arrangements for setting
transfer prices. Following the extension of ICTA88/SCH28AA to cover
UK-to-UK transactions between affected persons it is perhaps
particularly likely that UK based groups of companies which have
not hitherto been subject to Sch28AA may seek to raise such issues
with their Inspectors.
Where, as will often be the case, the issue is the provision
of services by one or more companies within a group, then it is
probable that
INTM464055 will cover the situation
and taxpayers may be referred to that guidance which should help
them to self assess. (Inspectors should also refer to
INTM461020).
In other circumstances Inspectors should exercise caution
about being drawn into discussions about transfer pricing issues
which may leave taxpayers with expectations that they may rely on
some “understanding” reached with the Inspector when
later submitting their Returns.
In particular, it is critical that inspectors distinguish
between giving general guidance on the law relating to transfer
pricing, which is a necessary customer service measure, and any
discussion which may come to be regarded by a taxpayer as amounting
to an agreement that a particular price or formula offers a
“correct” solution to a transfer pricing problem.
In general, Inspectors should confine themselves to giving
advice on methodology only. In this way there can be no reasonable
inference that any particular price for a good or service used in
calculating profits in a Return will be considered by the HM
Revenue & Customs to satisfy the requirements of the transfer
pricing rules.
It is the taxpayer’s obligation to make a return in
accordance with the arm’s length standard. It is invariably
the case that taxpayers will know more about pricing structures and
about where value is added in their businesses and industries than
do Inspectors, and taxpayers should use such knowledge and their
commercial judgement to make arrangements and set prices which
conform to the arm’s length standard.
In the most complex transfer pricing situations an Advance
Pricing Agreement may be a possibility and taxpayers should be
referred to
INTM469010 and Statement of Practice
3/99.
