IHTA84/S124B relaxes the conditions in IHTA84/S124A and will
apply in the situation where the transferee (
IHTM24179) has sold all or part of the
original property (
IHTM24174)] before the death of the
transferor and reinvested the whole of the proceeds in the purchase
of other qualifying agricultural property – ‘the
replacement property’. This does not include shares in
agricultural companies within IHTA84/S122. Different parts of the
property can be replaced at different times but there cannot be
replacement from any replacement property to further property.
The conditions for IHTA84/S124B to apply are that
Where the above requirements are met the conditions ( IHTM24173) in IHTA84/S124A (3) are taken to be satisfied in relation to the original property so long as the further following conditions are also met in relation to the replacement property
It may be that the transferor has died after disposal of the
original property by the transferee but before any acquisition of
replacement property. The relief will still apply if the
replacement property is acquired or a binding contract for its
acquisition entered into within the ‘allowed period’
referred to above, IHTA84/S124B (5). Note that this subsection only
applies where the transferor has died
before the transferee.
The date of any disposal or acquisition for these purposes
is the date of the contract.
Relief is available at the rate applicable (
IHTM24140) at the date the lifetime
transfer was made.
If agricultural relief is not due because the replacement
property consists of non- agricultural business assets, business
relief may be available instead if the original property qualified
as relevant business property (
IHTM25141).
IHTA84/S124B (1)(b) refers to the ‘whole of the
consideration’. This is taken to mean the sale proceeds net
of professional costs and any CGT. A strict reading of the
legislation would suggest that the relief is completely lost if
anything less than the whole of the consideration were applied
towards the purchase of replacement property. However, in practice
you may usually allow relief in proportion to the amount of the
proceeds that have been used to purchase the replacement property.
You should seek advice on any case where this applies.
You should also seek advice on any case where the taxpayer
claims that the relief should apply where there is a longer period
than the three years ‘allowed period’ between the
original disposal and the purchase of replacement property