The following 8 examples apply to England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
for the benefit of A for life with remainder to B -
A has an interest in possession.
for the benefit of A whom failing for B -
A has a defeasible interest in possession.
for the benefit of such of A, B and C as S appoints and in
default for D -
D has a defeasible interest in possession unless S31 Trustee
Act 1925, or S32 of the Trustee Act (NI) 1958 in Northern Ireland,
applies and D is an infant in which case they do not have an
interest in possession until they reach majority or marry.
for the benefit of A whom failing for S -
A has an interest in possession (but if they die before S the
“reverter to settlor (
IHTM16121)” exemption will
apply).
for the benefit of such of A, B and C as survive S and, if none,
for the benefit of the last to die and the trust carries the
intermediate income -
A, B and C have contingent interests until the death of S and
have interests in possession unless S31 Trustee Act, or S32 of the
Trustee Act (NI) 1958 in Northern Ireland, applies and any is an
infant.
for the benefit of such of A, B and C as survive S and, if none,
for the benefit of the last to die and a trust for accumulation of
any income arising before the death of S has to be implied -
no-one has an interest in possession during the lifetime of S
unless only one of A, B and C is alive in which case there is only
one beneficiary.
for the benefit of such of A, B and C as survive S or attain 21
and, if none, then for the benefit of the last to die and the trust
carries the intermediate income
IHTA84/S71 is in point and, if the Family Law Reform Act 1969
applies, S31 Trustee Act, or S32 of the Trustee Act (NI) 1958 in
Northern Ireland, would apply until a beneficiary attained 18 when
they would have an interest in possession.
for the benefit of such of the children (unnamed) of S as
survive them and, if none, for the benefit of the last to die, and
S has at least one child -
any adult child would have an interest in possession provided
the contingent interest could be construed as carrying the
intermediate income and no trust for accumulation had to be implied
- see Child’s Trustee Co v IRC [1960] I Ch 534.