The following are examples of the application of reservation rules applying to policies.
The donor effects a whole life policy for the benefit of his
children. Premiums are payable annually and the donor pays those
premiums direct to the insurance company.
Strictly speaking, possession and enjoyment of the property disposed of by way of gift (the cash) has not been assumed by the donee. However, this particular point is not one which should of itself be taken to constitute the gift as one with reservation.
On 1 April 1998 the donor effects a whole life policy on his own
life in trust. The trustees have a power of appointment over the
trust fund which can be exercised in favour of the donor’s
wife but not the donor.
FA86/SCH20/para7 does not apply. The provision is only relevant if benefits can accrue to the donor or his spouse or civil partner ( IHTM11032) under the policy itself. It does not apply in a situation such as this where the spouse or civil partner can only benefit under the trust even though the assets of the trust include a policy of insurance.
The donor effects a straightforward life policy on her life
which is written under the Married Women’s Property Act upon
trust for such of her children as survive her and attain the age of
eighteen. If she should die childless then the policy will revert
to her estate by way of resulting trust. She dies three years
FA86/SCH20/para7 does not apply. The benefits accruing to the children will vary according to their survival (and attaining the specified age) not by reference to any benefits which will or may accrue to the donor because of her residual interest.
In 1980 the donor effected a whole life policy on the life of
his wife for his own benefit. In 1982 he took out a loan with the
insurance company which was secured on the policy. Interest on the
loan was charged each year and added to the loan. In 1987 he
executed a declaration of trust of the policy, charged with the
loan, in favour of his son (absolutely) and died the following
Para 7 does not apply. The benefits accruing to the child do vary (because the amount receivable is dependent upon the amount of loan and interest outstanding) but they do not vary by reference to the benefits to the donor under the policy, but under the loan agreement.
However, the existence of the loan, and the fact that interest was added to it each year, impaired the son’s enjoyment of the gifted property and trenched upon his rights therein. Accordingly the conditions of FA86/S102 (1)(b) are not satisfied and there is a GWR claim.
An endowment policy is effected in trust for a named beneficiary
if living on the death of the donor/life assured before the
termination date of the policy; otherwise for the donor/life
assured. The “termination date” could include the
maturity, the early maturity on guaranteed terms, the surrender of
the policy etc.
It is likely that in such a case, the donor can decide when “termination” should occur. If that is so the donor is not entirely excluded from the gifted property (because he can terminate the policy and claim the proceeds) and the GWR provisions apply.
A husband and wife jointly settle an insurance policy on trusts
under which there is an immediate interest in possession. The
trustees have a power of appointment over the whole fund in favour
of a number of persons including the settlors but each settlor is
specifically excluded from benefiting from the part which (s)he
The inclusion of each settlor’s spouse or civil partner ( IHTM11032) as an object of the trust affecting the settlor’s share would not of itself make either gift a GWR.
The donor effects a whole life policy in trust for the primary
benefit of his children who have a defeasible interest in
possession. The trustees, who include the settlor, have a power of
appointment over the settled property which can be exercised in
favour of the members of a class of beneficiaries who do not
include the settlor.
The fact that the settlor is a trustee is not in itself sufficient to bring the property within the GWR provisions.