GREIT11315 – Groups: leaving the regime: effects of cessation: on availability of tax relief for losses
Losses etc relating to the tax-exempt property businesses cannot
be carried forward for use in working out profits of any post-REIT
property business. This is because the tax-exempt property rental
business of the group members is treated as ceasing once the group
leaves the regime.
Neither can losses arising in the first accounting period of
post-cessation business be carried back to reduce profits of
accounting periods before the group left the regime. This is
because post-REIT property business is a different business,
carried on by a different person (since the tax-exempt part of each
group member is deemed to be a company separate from the company
post-cessation.
To the extent that a group member, while the group was a
UK-REIT, carried on activities other than property rental, these
are regarded as a business that carries on uninterrupted, before,
during and after the group is in the regime. If the group member
had a Case I loss in the final accounting period before the group
leaves the regime, that loss can be carried forward in the normal
way and used against profits of the trade as carried on by it after
the group has left the regime.
If a group member has unused capital losses, including losses
on disposal of non-ring fence assets while the group was in the
regime and losses that arose on pre-entry disposals of rental
property, they can be carried forward and used to reduce chargeable
gains that may arise to the group member post-cessation. This is
because the group member pre-entry, the residual part while the
group was a UK-REIT and post-cessation are not deemed to be
separate companies or members of separate groups.
