The FSA has recognised that the definition of insurance business has long been an area of difficulty and has provided further guidance on the identification of contracts of insurance. This is set out in its Perimeter Guidance (see PERG 6). The Prudential case ( GIM1030) remains the basis of this guidance, which summarises the key points of an insurance contract as one under which a provider undertakes:
The guidance identifies a range of factors which point to a contract being classified as insurance or non-insurance. For example, the following are unlikely to be contracts of insurance, namely those:
The guidance also gives examples which illustrate these factors
in relation to a number of areas which commonly give rise to
discussion as to whether the transactions amount to insurance. The
examples given are discretionary medical schemes, disaster recovery
business, manufacturers’ and retailers’ warranties,
separate warranty transactions, tax investigation schemes,
solicitors’ retainers, and so-called time and distance cover,
where the uncertainty is merely over timing. Consideration of these
examples may be helpful in cases where there may be doubt about
whether a contract is one of insurance or not.
The guidance also makes the point that consideration for a
contract of insurance does not have to be in the form of a discrete
or distinct premium. It may be part of the purchase price of goods,
and it may be in non-monetary form (for example, part of the
service provided by an employee under a contract of
employment).