ESM0524 - Guide to determining status: control over when the work is done
One element of control is the right to control when the worker carries out the work.
Most employees are required to work hours prescribed by their employer. Details of these hours and when they will be worked will normally be set out in the contract of employment or other documentation. The documents may also indicate flexitime and time off etc arrangements
There will be occasions when an employer exerts little control over when the employee carries out his or her duties. For example, skilled or senior employees may be left unsupervised to complete projects or duties as they see fit. Additionally, the lack of a requirement to work specific hours usually has only marginal importance.
This was the case in Robin Hamilton v The Secretary of State for Social Services (an unreported decision) when skilled production workers who were not required to work specified hours were found to be employees. In his judgement Hodgson J said
Usually, self-employed workers are not subject to extensive control over when the work is carried out. There may be an agreed deadline by which the specific work, or stages in the work, should be completed. However, within this deadline, the worker will usually have freedom to do the work at times to suit himself or herself. On the other hand, workers engaged under contracts for services may be subject to considerable restrictions where commercial pressures dictate. For example, if working on large sites where access is limited to normal working hours, the worker is not going to be able to work as and when he or she pleases. In such circumstances the limitations put on when the work can be carried out tells us nothing about the status of the individual and other factors will have to be considered.
Part-time, casual, temporary and short-term workers may control when they work to a greater extent than full-time workers do. In Market Investigations the employer had
[Market Investigations Ltd v The Minister of Social Security (see ESM7040).]
Nevertheless the judge held that the control exercised by the company in other ways was quite sufficient to establish a contract of employment. The judge said that
See example ESM0525

