Chapter 3A in Part 7 of ITEPA is designed to counter avoidance by artificial reductions (things done other than for genuine commercial purposes, see ERSM50020) to the value of securities. It addresses value manipulation by depreciatory transactions.
Chapter 3A treats the artificial reductions as employment income and generally works by replacing the reduced market value in the calculation for each chargeable event with a figure of market value ignoring the artificial reduction.
The charge applies where the market value of a security has been reduced by more than 10% in a relevant period in connection with:
| ERSM20500 |
| ERSM30390 |
| ERSM30230 |
| ERSM40060 |
| ERSM80010 |
| ERSM90020 |
Broadly, there are four areas where a reduction in the value of securities might reduce the liability to tax if unchallenged:-
See examples at ERSM50030.
You must seek advice from the Employee Shares and Securities Unit (ESSU) – see ERSM10040.
If unusual structures or transactions which have their own tax consequences are used in an attempt to avoid tax it is highly likely that multiple charges to Income Tax and NICs will arise under Chapter 3A and elsewhere. Where multiple charges arise in an avoidance case, advice on how to pursue these should be obtained from ESSU – see ERSM10040.
There is no clearance procedure available to determine whether or not Chapter 3A might apply to transactions. Employers and employees need to consider the structures they are using in incentive schemes. The provisions are aimed at artificial avoidance schemes that are designed to transfer value to employees at tax and NIC rates less than would be expected on cash remuneration. In applying the legislation HMRC will take account of the purpose of the legislation and will not be applying it to innocent arrangements that are not designed to reward employees at reduced tax rates, unless non-arm’s length intra-group transactions are passing value into employees’ securities.