EM2701 - Examining Accounts: What Will an Enquiry Involve?
An enquiry, whether an aspect or full enquiry, will involve
examining the underlying books and records or documents which
support the accuracy of the figures in the Return. An aspect
enquiry will still entail looking at prime records to ascertain
whether the figures under enquiry are accurate or not.
In any enquiry it is wrong to raise matters on a piecemeal
basis. You should only introduce new areas of enquiry which arise
from your initial findings. An aspect enquiry can develop into a
full enquiry
EM1905.
No proof of evasion
In most enquiries there will be no proof of evasion when the
case is opened. It is important to be tactful in your handling of
the case. You should not prejudge the issue.
Not all enquiries will result in the discovery of omissions.
You begin with limited knowledge of what is going on and there will
be occasions when a perfectly acceptable explanation emerges. It is
important to close such cases down immediately. You should not
pursue them in an attempt to obtain a small addition solely to
avoid a 'nil' result.
Every business is different
Much of the work in any enquiry will involve an element of routine. What makes the work interesting, however, is that every case is different, because every individual and every business is different. The pattern of cases may tend to be similar, but each will require you to use your imagination in evaluating the facts and deciding on the appropriate steps to take. Often it is the unusual feature which holds the key. Above all you must try to put yourself in the position of the trader or director. The more you can understand his or her conduct of the business, and the motivation and scope for any evasion, the better your chances of arriving at an appropriate result.
Introduction to accounts enquiries: arrangement of sections
EM2710+ look in detail at full enquiries. Different points have
been dealt with separately rather than try to impose an unreal
chronology, and so there is a little duplication.
There can be more than one correct way to handle a particular
case, and many more wrong ways.
All enquiries will have a beginning, a middle and an end.
Sometimes individual stages will not amount to much, especially if
you do not receive any co-operation. Action should only be
undertaken when it is appropriate. However, records examination
will usually be necessary to show the unreliability of accounts and
will often lead to the discovery of certain types of evasion. It
will be rare to come across a case where it is not essential to
interview the proprietor or director personally about the business
and their private finances.
Similarly, where you believe there are omissions, you should
select the method of recalculating profits which you consider will
produce the most reliable result. Showing that accounts are
unreliable because of inadequate record keeping does not prove that
there have been omissions. All you have done is to show the
unreliability of the taxpayer's evidence as to the level of profit.
You still need to produce your own evidence if you wish to
substitute a higher figure.
The first section, overview of accounts evasion, looks at
discrete points of an accounts enquiry, from opening the enquiry
through to conclusion. In any case you should always be striving to
decide which of the opportunities for evasion is open to the
taxpayer, and how you can prove whether or not he or she has taken
them.
