EIM40104 - Dual contract arrangements: example
Section 22 ITEPA 2003
A US citizen is employed by ABC Inc, a company resident in the
US. The employee is assigned to work in London for a subsidiary
company DEF Ltd for a period of 5 years. It is estimated that 40%
of duties will be performed outside of the United Kingdom, in
Europe and the US.
The employee relocates to London. In consequence of his
intention to remain in the United Kingdom for 5 years he is
resident and ordinarily resident from the date of arrival but not
domiciled.
The employee is invited to structure the employments as
described below:
ABC Inc.
This employment continues from before and throughout the period of the assignment. The letter of assignment specifies a list of clients and duties to be serviced and dealt with outside of the United Kingdom.
DEF Ltd.
The new employment commences with the employee's arrival from
the US. Duties specified in the contract include a portfolio of
clients and line management responsibilities in the United Kingdom.
The contract with ABC Inc is remunerated at a rate
approximately 50% higher than that with DEF Ltd.
Comments
The employee is not domiciled in the United Kingdom. ABC Inc is
not resident here but resident in the US. If the duties of this
employment are performed wholly abroad then the earnings will be
chargeable overseas earnings within Section 22 and will only be
taxable if they are remitted to the United Kingdom.
Emoluments from DEF Ltd fall into Section 21 and the taxable
amount will be the full amount of Section 21 earnings received in
the tax year.
If the employee was assigned to carry out one employment, but
at a later date that was sub- divided to exploit Section 22, you
may challenge and seek evidence that there are two employments in
reality.
ABC Inc and DEF Ltd are “associated” with each
other. See Rule C in Section 24(5) and Section 24(6) that imports
the definition of control from Section 416 ICTA 1988. The disparity
in levels of remuneration may require use of Section 24.
Appendix 3 at
EIM77030 provides greater detail about
the HMRC approach to dual contract arrangements.
(This text has been withheld because of exemptions in the
Freedom of Information Act 2000)
