EIM12960 - Termination payments and benefits: payments made under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA): unfair dismissal
A common cause of complaint to Employment Tribunals under ERA is
that of
unfair dismissal. This means dismissal contrary to
the provisions of ERA.
If a complaint is proved a Tribunal has first to decide
whether the employer should be required to reinstate or re-engage
the employee. If reinstatement or re-engagement is ordered under
Section 113 ERA, the Tribunal order will specify the date of
reinstatement (Section 114) or re-engagement (Section 115).
The Tribunal will also specify the amount payable by the
employer to compensate for any benefit (including arrears of pay)
that the employee would have had if he or she had continued as an
employee for the period from the date of dismissal until the date
of reinstatement or re- engagement. This sum is compensation for
unfair dismissal and so is taxable only under Section 401 ITEPA
2003 so the employer should operate PAYE where the aggregate
payments within that Section exceed £30,000 (see
EIM13530). If, exceptionally, there is
as a matter of fact continuous employment between the dates of
dismissal and reinstatement or re-engagement ordered by the
Tribunal, any payment for that period is taxable under Section 62
ITEPA 2003 (see
EIM00600). This may happen where an
employee is dismissed and immediately re-employed to allow a
provision to be left out of the contract, and the date of
reinstatement or re-engagement is later than the re-employment
date.
If the Tribunal does not order the employee to be reinstated
or re-engaged then it will order the employer to pay compensation
for the unfair dismissal under Section 112(4) ERA. It may also
order compensation, under Section 117 ERA, where the employer fails
to comply with an earlier decision that the employee be reinstated
or re-engaged. These awards of compensation are for loss of the
employment and liability will arise only under Section 401 ITEPA
2003 (see
EIM13000).
When making a complaint of unfair dismissal, an employee may
also claim that the employer failed to provide him or her with a
written statement of the reasons for dismissal. If this claim is
upheld, the Tribunal may award compensation under Section 93(2)(b)
ERA. This compensation is taxable only under Section 401 ITEPA
2003.
For details concerning wrongful dismissal, see
EIM12970.
