A member of an NHS trust board attends meetings of the board in
Exeter. She has no office facilities available to her in Exeter to
prepare for meetings. She receives papers from the NHS trust at her
home in Salcombe and reads the papers at home. This takes several
hours and she would not be able to take a full part in meetings if
she did not do this work at home. She requests a deduction for the
cost of travel between her home and her permanent workplace in
No deduction should be permitted. Home should not be accepted as a workplace.
A is an area sales manager who lives in Glasgow. He manages his company’s sales team in Scotland. The company’s nearest office is in Newcastle, and A therefore carries out all his administrative work at home where he has set aside a room as an office. The administrative work is part of the substantive duties of his employment. A is entitled to relief for the additional costs which he incurs as a result of working at home. The nature of his job requires him to live in Scotland, where no employer-provided office facilities are available.
B works for the same company as A. He is the company’s sales manager for the North East of England. The company would be happy for him to work from its offices in Newcastle, but they have agreed that B can work from his home in Durham, where he has set aside a room as an office. B is not entitled to a deduction for his homeworking expenses because he is working at home by choice.
The company which employs A and B decides to close its regional offices and to operate solely from its head office in London. B is still the area sales manager for the North East of England and he continues to work from his home in Durham. The work that he does at home is part of the substantive duties of his employment. Following the closure of the Newcastle office he has no practical alternative but to provide himself with office facilities at his own expense. B is now entitled to relief for the additional costs which he incurs as a result of working at home.
A is promoted to become the company’s national director of sales. That is normally a head office job. However A is a fervent supporter of his local football team and rather than relocate to London he persuades the company to allow him to continue to work from home. A is no longer entitled to a deduction for his homeworking expenses because he is now working at home by choice.
C works at his company’s offices in Leeds. His home is in Kings Lynn and he spends the week in Leeds, travelling home at weekends. His employer then introduces a homeworking policy under which those employees who wish to do so can work from home. C accepts the offer and thereafter works from his home in Kings Lynn, where he sets aside a room for use as an office. He is not entitled to a deduction for homeworking expenses because he is working at home by choice. (This example is based on a real case: Kirkwood v Evans, 74TC148, see EIM32374.)
D lives in Gloucester and applies for a job with a company whose offices are in Birmingham. The company are happy to pay his expenses of moving from Gloucester to somewhere on the outskirts of Birmingham. However D does not want to disrupt his childrens’ schooling, or to commute between Gloucester and Birmingham, so he asks the company if he can work from home. The company agrees, and D’s employment contract says that he will be home based. He sets aside a room for use as an office. D is not entitled to a deduction for homeworking expenses because he is working at home by choice. The contractual term requiring him to work at home is simply an expression of his personal choice.
A company employs a team of sales people whose job is to follow up sales leads by telephone. The company trades from two small offices which house the director, her secretary and two clerical staff. There is no room for the sales team, who are recruited specifically on the basis that they will work from home. The members of the sales team are entitled to a deduction for the additional costs which they incur by working at home.
The company in example 7 becomes so profitable that it is able to move to larger premises. New recruits to the sales team are required to work at the company’s premises. Existing team members who live within daily commuting distance are invited to do so. Those who decide to continue to work from home are now doing so by choice, and are no longer entitled to a deduction for a proportion of their household costs.
E is the UK sales representative of a Dutch company. The company does not have an office in the UK so E is recruited on the basis that he will work from home. He is entitled to a deduction for the additional costs that he incurs as a result of working at home.
F is a teacher at a secondary school. During term time she regularly takes work such as marking exercises home to complete in the evenings and at weekends. However she has free periods during the school day and the school has rooms available where she can mark papers if she wishes to do so. F is not entitled to a deduction for the expenses of working at home because appropriate facilities are available on her employer’s premises. She may feel that those facilities are inadequate, but that is not enough to satisfy the statutory test, see EIM70735. It is not an objective requirement of her job that she should perform any of her duties at home.