Local Authorities, and Health Service employers, carry on many activities that do not amount to trading, and where Section 356 ITEPA 2003 therefore does not apply. You do not have to consider Section 356 in relation to employees of bodies who incur entertainment expenses solely in connection with non-trading activities (see EIM32566 and EIM32575). Those employees are entitled to a deduction for business entertainment expenses that satisfy the conditions in Section 336 (see EIM32615 onwards).
However, Local Authorities and Health Service bodies may also
carry on activities that do amount to trading, and it is necessary
to consider the impact of Section 356 on employees who incur
entertainment expenses in connection with those activities. The
employing authority, or body, is completely exempt from tax on all
its income (Sections 519(1) and 519A(1) ICTA 1988). There is
therefore no question of such an employer preparing a computation
of "profits chargeable to tax", as the question of chargeability
does not arise. Nor is there any question of tax relief applying to
such profits.
It follows that:
The ability of a Local Authority or Health Service employee to claim a deduction for entertainment expenses therefore depends, in the first instance, on whether or not the expenses are in connection with a trading activity carried on by the employer. If they are in connection with a trade, no deduction is due because of Section 356 (see EIM32585). If they are not in connection with a trading activity, a deduction will be due subject to the conditions in Section 336 (see EIM32615 onwards).