EIM21834 – Particular benefits: late night taxis: third condition: public transport ceased or not reasonable to expect employee to use it
Section 248(2) (c) ITEPA 2003
In certain circumstances there is an exemption from the benefit
in kind charge that would otherwise arise where an employer
provides a late night taxi for an employee to travel home from work
(see
EIM21831).
The exemption can apply only where all four late night
working conditions are satisfied (
EIM21831), and is limited to 60 such
journeys in a year. The first late night working condition is
explained in
EIM21832 and the second condition in
EIM21833. If both these conditions are
satisfied, the third condition is that by the time the employee
stops work
- either public transport is not available for the journey from work to home; or
- it is not reasonable to expect the employee to use public transport.
Public transport no longer available
It is a matter of fact whether public transport for an
employee’s journey has ceased by the time an employee
finishes working later than usual and at or after 9pm.
If a normal journey from work to home requires an employee to
use more than one form of public transport, and one of those forms
of public transport for part of the journey has ceased to be
available, HMRC accepts that public transport is not available for
the whole journey. For example, if an employee works in a city
centre, he may take a train from there to the suburb in which he
lives and a bus from the train station to the end of the road in
which he lives. If by the time of the employee’s journey home
after 9pm the train service is still running but the bus service
has ceased for the day, we accept that public transport is not
available for the journey.
Not reasonable to expect employee to use Public Transport
The legislation does not prescribe circumstances where it would be reasonable for an employer to not expect an employee to use public transport where it is available. However, HMRC does not accept that the exemption applies where a taxi is provided after 9pm to an employee solely on grounds that he or she
- has to travel home from work in the dark; or
- has had a long working day and is tired; or
- has a heavy briefcase, or similar, to take home with them; or
- travels by public transport to a station that is unmanned; or
- the frequency of public transport is reduced.
An employer may consider some or all of these factors when
deciding whether it is reasonable to expect an employee to use
public transport but none of them is sufficient on its own to
satisfy the third condition in the exemption in s248. In many
areas, and especially in bigger towns and cities, many employees
will be travelling from work to home after 9pm on public transport.
The frequency of the service may be reduced compared with earlier
in the day but it is reasonable to expect employees to know this
from published timetables and to make plans accordingly.
Reduced frequency of service after 9pm is not of itself
sufficient cause for the exemption to apply, if the nature and
duration of the journey is not significantly different from that at
other times of day. However, HMRC accepts that if reduced
availability and/or reliability makes it likely that a journey
after 9pm would take significantly longer than an equivalent
journey at another time of day, the exemption would apply.
The extent to which an employee’s journey from work to
home after 9pm on public transport is significantly different from
a journey earlier on in the day, so that it is reasonable for an
employer not to expect the employee to undertake that journey,
depends on the facts in each case.
Apart from the issue of the employee having a significantly
longer journey after 9pm, an employer may also consider the
employee’s perception of personal safety when deciding
whether it is reasonable to expect them to use public transport. As
with the extent to which journey times increase after 9pm, each
case will depend on its own facts. However, for the exemption to
apply, the circumstances of the case must demonstrate a significant
difference from the normal situation where people continue to use
public transport after 9pm.
Examples
- An employee is required to work late and until after 9pm on irregular occasions. When she finishes work a train service is available for her usual journey from work to home but the timetable indicates the journey will take nearly two hours instead of the usual 45 minutes. On these occasions the employer provides the employee with a taxi for the journey home.
HMRC accepts that in such circumstances, if the employer decides to provide a late night taxi home the exemption in s248 would apply on the basis that it would be reasonable for the employer to not expect the employee to use public transport which meant an extra hour or more travelling time over his or her normal journey home.
- An employee who normally works from 9am to 5pm is required irregularly to work until later than 9pm. The employee’s normal journey on public transport takes 60 minutes but after 9pm it takes 30 minutes longer. While, in itself, her journey home is not significantly longer than normal, she lives in a rural area where, at that time of night, and in the circumstances of her late working, her employer considers that it would not be reasonable to expect her to use public transport and, therefore, provides a taxi. In such circumstances the exemption in s248 applies.
