DT1923 - Non-residents: UK income: Employment
The third condition for exemption under Article 15(2) is that
the remuneration of the employee must not be borne by a permanent
establishment or fixed base which the employer has in the United
Kingdom - see DT1710 onwards and DT219 for general guidance
concerning the meaning of these terms.
This condition should be considered carefully in all cases
where the employee has not apparently been assigned to work in the
United Kingdom for a United Kingdom-resident company. If an
employee has simply been seconded by his overseas employer to work
here for a United Kingdom-resident company it will not usually be
necessary to consider this condition.
A subsidiary company in the United Kingdom is not generally
a permanent establishment of its overseas parent company (see
DT1714). The subsidiary is not in law part of its parent company
but is a distinct legal person. A permanent establishment is simply
a part of an overseas company which is transplanted in the United
Kingdom. Customers and employees all contract with the overseas
company rather than with a separate legal person in the United
Kingdom. Company letter-paper often indicates how the United
Kingdom operations are organised; the registered number and place
of registration of a United Kingdom company are often given at the
head or foot of the paper.
If operations in the United Kingdom are carried out through
a permanent establishment, it should be assumed in the absence of
evidence to the contrary that the cost of remuneration of an
employee seconded to the permanent establishment is a deduction in
computing the profits of the permanent establishment. This will be
the normal basis of allocating costs in accordance with
international tax principles. The permanent establishment should
therefore be regarded as bearing the cost of that individual's
remuneration unless there is evidence that the overseas Head Office
continues to pay the employee and the cost is not allocated to the
United Kingdom permanent establishment for United Kingdom tax
purposes. A permanent establishment cannot be said to `bear the
remuneration' unless it is charged against its profits without a
corresponding credit, for example by way of a management charge. In
doubtful cases advice may be sought from the Inspector dealing with
the accounts of the permanent establishment.
Sometimes dealing with the PAYE District may be the first
contact which an overseas company has with the United Kingdom
Revenue and it may not yet have been established whether or not the
company has a permanent establishment in the United Kingdom. If the
company has had no prior contact with the Revenue the Corporation
Tax District which would have responsibility for the company (the
District dealing with the area where the business premises of the
company are located) should be asked to advise whether or not a
permanent establishment exists in the United Kingdom (see DT1715 in
cases of difficulty).
