The losses etc of the straddling period are apportioned for the purposes of ICTA88/SCH17/PARA1 (3) as follows:
A dual resident investing company draws up its accounts for the
calendar year 1987. In this accounting period it incurs a loss of
£100 made up of excess management expenses of £12 and
excess charges of £88. It pays interest of £43 on 30 June
1987, and of £45 on 31 December 1987.
Under ICTA88/SCH17/PARA1 (3), the dual resident investing
company's accounting period is divided into two component
accounting periods, being 1 January 1987 to 31 March 1987, and 1
April 1987 to 31 December 1987.
The excess management expenses of £12 fall to be
apportioned on a time basis, hence 3/12 are apportioned to the
first period and 9/12 to the second. The excess charges, however,
are apportioned according to the dates of payment. In this case, as
no interest was paid in the first period the whole of the excess
charges are allocated to the second period.
The loss of £100 is therefore apportioned:
1 January 1987 to 31 March 1987 3/12 x £12 = £3.
1 April 1987 to 31 December1987 9/12 x £12 = £9.
Excess charges 88/97.
£97 of the loss is not available for set off as group
relief.
A dual resident investing company draws up its accounts for the
calendar year 1987. In this accounting period it incurs a loss of
£100 made up solely of excess charges. It makes four interest
payments in the year totalling £120, being 31 March 1987
£31, 30 June 1987 £30, 30 September 1987 £29 and 31
December 1987 £30.
The dual resident investing company's accounting period is
divided into two component accounting periods as in example 1.
Under ICTA88/SCH17/PARA3 (b), the excess charges are apportioned
between the component accounting periods according to the dates of
payment and in proportion to the amount of interest paid on those
dates.
The loss of £100 is therefore apportioned:
1 January 1987 to 31 March 1987 31/120 x £100 =
£25.83.
1 April 1987 to 31 December 1987 89/120 x £100 =
£74.17.