Company 1 in State A is an intermediate company between a UK
parent and the surrendering company, but it is not in the ownership
chain between the surrendering company and the nearest UK company
(Y) of which the surrendering company is a 75% subsidiary.
Company 2 in State B is an intermediate company that is in
the ownership chain between the surrendering company and the
nearest UK company (Y) of which the surrendering company is a 75%
subsidiary.
So, in this example, the precedence condition prevents a
claim for relief under the new rules to the extent that relief can
be given in State B.
Companies 1 & 3 (in States A & B) are not intermediate
companies.
Company 2 (in State B) is an intermediate company that is in
the ownership chain between the surrendering company and the
nearest UK company (X) of which the surrendering company is a 75%
subsidiary.
So, the precedence condition prevents a claim for relief
under the new rules to the extent that relief can be given in State
B (including, for example, where relief can be given to Company 3
in State B).
Company 1 in State A is an intermediate company that is in the
ownership chain between the surrendering company and the nearest UK
company (Y) of which the surrendering company is a 75% subsidiary.
Company 2 in State B is an intermediate company between a UK
parent and the surrendering company, but is not in the ownership
chain between the surrendering company and the nearest UK company
(Y) of which the surrendering company is a 75% subsidiary.
So, in this example, the precedence condition prevents a
claim for relief under the new rules to the extent that relief can
be given in State A.