CTM03730 - Corporation Tax: small companies: control by the same person or persons

ICTA88/S416

You should bear in mind that more than one person (or group of persons) may have control of a company at the same time. For example, one person may have the greater part of the voting power, while another holds the greater part of the issued share capital and yet a third is entitled to the greater part of the assets in a winding-up (for the meaning of 'control' - see CTM60210 to CTM60230.

Whether or not two companies are under the control of the same person will be obvious as soon as you have applied the control tests in Section 416 (2) to (6) to both companies. However, to determine whether two companies are under the control of the same persons you have to establish which group or groups of persons control each company.

You should only regard the two companies as under the control of the same persons if:

  • a group which controls one company is identical with a group which controls the other,

and

  • for each company, that group is a 'minimum controlling combination'.

A 'minimum controlling combination' means a group of persons which has control of the company but which would not have control of it if any one of the persons were excluded from the group.

For example, if three unconnected persons, A, B and C, each hold one third of the shares in a company, there are three minimum controlling combinations; A and B together, or B and C together, or A and C together. Since you can clearly establish that control is held by any two together, the addition of another person to the controlling combination is superfluous and you should not also contend that A, B and C together control the company.

Example

Company CB
Shares
Mr A 50Mr B 50Mr C 50total issued shares 150
Company AA
Shares
Mr A 50Mr B 50Mr C 50Mr D 50total issued shares 200

A, B, C and D are not associates.

Company CB is controlled by A and B together, or A and C together, or B and C together, that is by any two of them together.

Company AA is controlled by A, B and C together, or A, B and D together, or A, C and D together, or B, C and D together, that is by any three of them together.

As there is no group of persons controlling Company CB which is identical with a group of persons controlling Company AA, you should not regard the two companies as associated.

However if A and B' shares together entitled them to the greater part of the voting power in Company AA, then we would have an identical group controlling both companies (albeit by a separate test in ICTA88/S416 (2)(a)) and so we would regard the two companies as associated.