When considering the amount of a business's average annual expenditure on construction operations the following points should be noted.
For the purposes of CIS, 'construction operations' include only operations carried out in the UK and its territorial waters (treated as the twelve-mile limit). Only expenditure arising for work done within these limits should be taken into account.
Expenditure on construction operations may be on
Where the expenditure on repairs does not differentiate between
repairs to property and repairs to plant and machinery it may be
necessary to ask for an analysis to identify the portion relating
to construction operations.
Similarly, where the additions to property do not
distinguish between new work and alterations commissioned by the
business itself on one hand and the purchases of buildings on the
other it may be necessary to ask for an approximate allocation of
the expenditure. You need not subject the allocation provided to
close scrutiny. The aim is to identify businesses that are clearly
deemed contractors.
You should exercise discretion, however, when asking for
analyses of repairs or other expenditure. For example, a charge for
repairs in the accounts of a manufacturing concern with a limited
property estate can probably be regarded as substantially applying
to its production machinery.
Where the business under consideration is a company, the average
expenditure test should be applied to its own construction
expenditure. The test should
not be applied to a group of companies as a whole.
Certain groups of companies concentrate their property
service requirements on a single member company that deals with
property transactions and maintenance for the rest of the group.
Where this applies, and you conclude that the property company is a
deemed contractor, expenditure on construction work placed through
this company by other group members should be disregarded when
considering whether each of the group members is a deemed
contractor. This is so that the same expenditure is not counted
twice.
Where one company transfers the whole or part of its trade to
another company and ICTA88/s343 applies to the transfer, all or
some of the construction expenditure incurred by the first company
is attributable to the second company in determining whether the
latter is a deemed contractor.
If the whole of the trade is transferred, all construction
expenditure incurred by the first company is attributable to the
second company.
If only part of the trade is transferred, the construction
expenditure attributable to the second company is proportional to
the portion of the trade transferred.
Any apportionment must be 'just and reasonable' and if the
second company disputes the apportionment proposed by the Inspector
it may appeal against the decision.
This is provided for at FA04/s59 (4).