A finance leased asset remains wholly outside Schedule 29 in the hands of the lessor if:
The assets in question are those listed in CIRD25110, namely those which are:
If finance lease rentals in the form of royalties in respect of otherwise excluded assets were brought within Schedule 29 then only that part of the royalty representing interest on the financing would be recognised as a taxable credit under Schedule 29. But the lessor would remain entitled to any capital allowances available under the general CT code, for instance on computer software.
If finance lessors were allowed to lease intangibles to lessees within the charge to income tax, the policy of confining the new rules to those within the charge to CT would be undermined. The lessee would be able to deduct its full rental payments but the lessor would not be taxed on the loan repayment element of the rentals. The lessee would enjoy the benefit of this mismatch through reduced rental payments.
This provision is to ensure that a company within the charge to
CT cannot circumvent the exclusion of ‘existing assets’
(see
CIRD11505 but, broadly, intangible
fixed assets which fail the time test described in
CIRD11500 onwards) from the regime by a
sale and lease-back arrangement.
A ‘related party’ is defined at
CIRD45105 onwards.