Consider again the example at
CFM17190a:
Original owner sells gilts for £100m
Under a standard repo it would repurchase in 3 months for
£101m
But during the repo period an interest payment of £2m
will be made.
Rather than repurchase price being £101m the parties
agree that the interim holder will not be required to make any
manufactured payment in respect of interest receipt but will
repurchase instead for £99m. The tax consequences are set out
below.
The original owner is deemed to have received manufactured payments equivalent to the real interest/dividend of £2m. This is taxed in same way as if it had received a real manufactured payment:
This deemed payment is then added to the actual repurchase price for the purpose of determining the Section 730A or ITA07/S607 price differential. So in the example above the original owner is deemed to repurchase for £101m. This should give the original owner a loan relationship debit of £1m deductible on an amortised cost basis (or authorised accruals basis for pre-2005 starting accounting periods).
The interim holder receives real interest/dividends and is
deemed to make equivalent manufactured payments. These amounts
should cancel out leaving no tax effect.
The repurchase price is then treated as increased by the
amount of the deemed payment for the purpose of determining the
section 730A or ITA07/S607 price differential. In the example above
it is treated as buying for £100m and selling for £101m.
This should produce a loan relationship credit of £1m taxable
on an amortised cost basis.