This guidance applies to periods of account beginning on or
after 1 January 2005
Regulations 7, 8 and 9 all require there to be a
“hedging relationship” between a derivative contract
and a particular hedged item. Regulation 2(5) defines what is meant
by a hedging relationship.
If the derivative and the hedged item are designated by the
company as a hedge, there is automatically a hedging relationship
for the purposes of the Regulations. “Designated” has
the same meaning that it does for accounting purposes. Where a
hedging relationship has been designated under IAS 39 or FRS 26,
the company will have documented in advance its hedging strategy
and the nature and purpose of the particular hedge under
consideration, and it will expect the hedge to be highly effective
(
CFM16285).
There may, however, be a hedging relationship for tax
purposes even where the criteria in IAS 39 or FRS 26 for hedge
accounting are not satisfied. The test is whether the hedging
instrument is intended to act as a hedge of
See
CFM16040 for the meaning of “firm
commitment” and “forecast transaction”.
CFM13275 gives guidance on the
interpretation of “intended to act as a hedge”.
Where there is a hedging relationship, application of the
Disregard Regulations is mandatory unless the company has elected
out of the relevant regulation. A company cannot, for example,
apply the Disregard Regulations to designated hedges, but not to
“failed hedges” which do not meet the IAS 39 hedging
criteria.
A “hedging instrument” may comprise all or only
part of a derivative contract. Similarly, the “hedged
item” may be all or only part of the overall asset, liability
or transaction.