CCM10100 - Penalties and Interest: Incorrect Claims - Disclosure / Co- Operation – Enquiries or Examinations Opened on or before 5 April 2008
Disclosure/co-operation - an abatement (discount) of up to
50% is available depending on the extent to which the claimant(s)
disclosed details of the irregularity and co-operated with the
examination or enquiry. This abatement is in keeping with the
departmental policy of rewarding those who, regardless of what they
have done wrong, help us to bring the examination or enquiry to a
speedy conclusion.
The maximum of 50% is available to someone who co-operates
fully and promptly with the examination or enquiry and who makes a
full and complete disclosure of the irregularities on challenge.
No abatement will be given to someone who refuses to
co-operate with the enquiry and who denies the irregularity or
deliberately gives incorrect information to hinder our progress.
Between these two extremes will be many variations and you
will have to use your judgement to decide on the appropriate
abatement. You cannot penalise someone if they were not asked to do
something or were not given an opportunity to do so. For example,
you open a Section 19 enquiry because you believe the claimant
started a second job during the year and the amount potentially
involved does not allow this to be worked as a discrepancy enquiry.
You already had details of the irregularities from the HMRC
database and so you simply had to put your findings to the claimant
who admitted the offence on challenge. They have not been asked to
do very much other than agree your findings but this should not
result in a low abatement.
You will be rewarding people who co-operate promptly but this
does not mean they have to respond immediately to all of your
communications. They are entitled to a reasonable amount of time
and this might depend on their other commitments. For example, you
ask the claimant to supply various documents and they say they
would like to meet with you to discuss these papers but they cannot
get any time off from work for at least a month. As long as they
are trying to respond to your enquiries at the earliest possible
opportunity they should not be penalised.
The claimant(s) should not be penalised simply because they
disagree with your interpretation of something which affects their
award of tax credits. They are entitled to disagree with your
interpretation and ask you to issue a formal notice revising the
award or imposing a penalty so that they can exercise their appeal
right. This is not, in itself, lack of co-operation as long as
there is a genuine disagreement regarding the interpretation of a
particular item. However, a claimant who deliberately ignores your
communications forcing you to use formal proceedings will receive
little or no abatement.
You must compute your calculation of the penalties on a form 94NTC.
