CA60400 - RDA: Qualifying expenditure
CAA01/S439 - S440
Qualifying expenditure is capital expenditure that a trader incurs on research and development directly undertaken by the trader or on the trader's behalf provided that:
- the research and development is related to a trade that the trader carries on, or
- the trader sets up and commences a trade connected with the research and development.
RDA is only due if the research and development expenditure is related to the trade being carried on or about to be carried on. research and development related to a trade includes:
- any research and development which may lead to or facilitate an extension of the trade; and
- medical research which has a special relation to the welfare of workers employed in that trade, for example research into an occupational disease.
You should only treat expenditure as incurred on behalf of a
trader if there is a clear, close and direct link between the
trader and the research undertaken. The relationship between the
person claiming the allowances and the person undertaking the
research need not be contractual, but if it is not it must be one
of agency, or something similar to agency. The fact that research
undertaken by someone else is for a trader's benefit, or is in his
interest, is not enough to make the expenditure qualify for RDA.
The case of Gaspet Ltd v Elliss [1987] 60TC91 supports this. In
that case the company provided funds and equipment necessary to
conduct operations under a petroleum exploration licence in return
for the rights to ownership of all petroleum won and saved to which
the licensee was entitled. It claimed that the expenditure incurred
under that agreement qualified for RDA because it was incurred on
scientific research directly undertaken on its behalf. The courts
rejected the claim. Under the agreement the company was responsible
for the payment of expenses by the company carrying out the
research and had rights to the ultimate potential fruits of the
research, but the agreement was not about research directly
undertaken by or on behalf of the company.
Medical research which qualifies for RDA does not include
research undertaken for the benefit of the community as a whole.
However, medical research undertaken for the benefit of the
community as a whole may qualify for RDA as research and
development which may lead to or facilitate an extension of the
trade. For example, medical research undertaken by a drug company
for the purpose of its trade may qualify because it is related to
its trade of manufacturing drugs.
Do not give allowances on the same expenditure in respect of
more than one trade.
A trader may have a trade which consists solely of research
and development. For example, a group of companies may set up a
company to carry out research and development on behalf of the
group. In such a case all the assets of that company's trade are
used for, or provide facilities for, research and development and
so expenditure on them qualifies for RDA unless it is specifically
excluded.
No allowances are due for expenditure on the acquisition of,
or of rights in or over, land. Where expenditure has been incurred
on acquiring a building, structure or fixed machinery or plant make
a just apportionment of the expenditure to exclude the part
relating to the cost of the land on which the building etc. stands.
Example When the Masters of Invention buy the
freehold interest in a laboratory the price that they pay includes
the land as well as the building. When they claim RDA they should
make a just apportionment to exclude the part of the price that
relates to the land.
