CA35300 - IBA: Balancing adjustments: Anti-avoidance
CAA01/S325 - S326
A person may try to create a balancing allowance by reducing the
value of the relevant interest, for example by granting a long
lease out of it for a large premium and at a low rent, and then
selling the relevant interest when its value has been reduced.
There is legislation to prevent this happening.
The legislation applies where:
the relevant interest in a building is transferred subject to
a subordinate interest;
and
the transfer gives rise to a balancing allowance; and either:
- any two of
- the former owner (the person to whom the balancing allowance would be made),
- the person who acquires the relevant interest and
- the person who acquires the subordinate interest are connected, or
- it appears that the sole or main benefit was obtaining an IBA.
This is the sort of situation that the legislation is designed
to catch. Jake and Elwood are brothers. Elwood owns the freehold of
an industrial building. He grants a long lease of the building for
a large premium and a nominal rent. This reduces the value of the
freehold interest. He then transfers the freehold to Jake when its
value is low and claims a balancing allowance.
Where the legislation applies, the transfer proceeds are
increased by the amount of any premium received. If no rent is
payable or the rent payable is less than the commercial rent the
transfer proceeds are increased by the amount they would have been
increased by if a commercial rent had been payable and the relevant
interest had been sold in the open market.
There is a limit on the amount by which the transfer proceeds
can be increased. They cannot be increased to more than the amount
which prevents a balancing allowance being made. This increase of
proceeds only affects the former owner. The person to whom the
relevant interest is transferred has the residue of qualifying
expenditure after transfer and so the IBAs are calculated as if the
balancing allowance had been made.
In the example above, Elwood’s transfer proceeds are
increased by the amount of the premium he received to reduce or
prevent his balancing allowance but the residue of qualifying
expenditure after sale, and so Jake’s IBAs, are calculated as
if the balancing allowance had been made.
The terms on which the subordinate interest was granted may
be varied before the relevant interest is transferred. If they are
any capital consideration paid for the variation is treated as a
premium for the grant of the subordinate interest and it is the
rent payable immediately before the transfer of the relevant
interest which is taken into consideration.
