A person (a
lessee) carrying on a qualifying activity may
incur expenditure under a lease on an asset for the purposes of
that qualifying activity. For example, the lessee may pay rent for
an asset to use in its trade.
If the lessee treats the lease as a long funding lease
CA23830 the lessee is treated as:
This means that the lessee satisfies the conditions for claiming
PMA
CA20006 based on the capital expenditure
they are treated as incurring. The capital expenditure that the
lessee is treated as incurring depends upon whether the lessee
treats the long funding lease as a finance lease or an operating
lease and broadly it follows the accounting treatment.
This treatment does
not apply if the lease is a hire or lease purchase
contract. In that case the lessee is entitled to PMA based on the
capital expenditure to be incurred under the contract
CA23300.
It does not matter if the lessee’s expenditure under
the long funding lease is capital or revenue. In both cases the
lessee is deemed to have incurred capital expenditure on the
provision of the asset.
Sometimes the lessee cannot treat the lease as a long funding
lease. In that case the lessee cannot claim PMA.
The lessee cannot treat a lease as a long funding lease if
the lessor or any superior lessor
CA23820:
If the lessor is not chargeable to tax assume that the lessor is chargeable to tax when you check conditions (a) and (b) above. These conditions mean that the lessee can only claim PMA if:
If the lessee cannot show that no superior lessor is entitled to
PMA it will not be entitled to capital allowances but it will get a
deduction for rental payments in the normal way.
Condition (b) means that the lessee cannot treat a lease as a
long funding lease if the lessor has claimed a capital allowance
other than a PMA on the asset. For example, the lessor may have
claimed 100% enterprise zone allowances if the asset is in a
building in an enterprise zone. If so, the lessee cannot treat the
lease as a long funding lease.
There is an exception to this. A lessee can claim capital
allowances even if the lessor has claimed them provided that the
lease is not a funding lease for the lessor
only because
CA23830:
The lessee must satisfy you that the lease is not excluded by the above rules before the lessee can treat it as a long funding lease.
This is the lessee’s capital expenditure.
If the long funding lease is an
operating lease the lessee’s capital
expenditure is the market value of the asset at the later of:
You calculate the market value ignoring the lease.
Example Z Plc. leases a plane to Dylan Airways
which brings it into use immediately. Dylan Airways treats the
lease as a long funding operating lease. If it were not for the
lease the market value of the plane when it is leased to Dylan
Airways would be £5 million. The plane’s market value
subject to the lease is £500,000. Dylan Airways’ capital
expenditure is £5 million.
If the long funding lease is a
finance lease the basic rule is that the
lessee’s capital expenditure is the present value of the
minimum lease payments
CA23850 at the appropriate date. The
appropriate date is the later of:
The present value of the minimum lease payments at the
appropriate date is the amount that would fall to be treated as the
present value of the minimum lease payments in the lessee’s
accounts at the appropriate date, assuming the accounts are
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice.
If a long funding lease is accounted for as a loan you should
calculate the lessee’s capital expenditure in the same
way.
This applies where the long funding lease is a finance lease.
If the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of entering
into:
If you have a case where there is a:
under which the lessee gets PMA based on an amount higher than the market value of the leased asset at the commencement of the lease you should assume that that was the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, for entering into it. It is a fact that that is one of the results and it is unlikely that it happened by chance. If the taxpayer does not want the legislation to apply it is up to them to show that the lease etc. was entered into for some other reason.
The fact that the lessee treats a lease as a long funding lease
does not mean that the lessor will have treated it as one and vice
versa.
If the lessor has not treated the lease as a long funding
lease the lessor will be entitled to capital allowances and the
lessee will not be entitled to PMA whether or not it treats the
lease as a long funding lease. Conversely, if the lessor treats the
lease as a long funding lease but the lessee does not neither the
lessor nor the lessee will be entitled to PMA because the lessor
will have brought a disposal value to account and the lessee will
not satisfy the conditions for claiming PMA.
Example Z Plc. leases a plane to Dylan Airways.
Dylan Airways treats the lease as a long funding lease and wants to
claim capital allowances. Dylan Airways can only treat the lease as
a long funding lease and claim capital allowances if either:
Treat a long funding lease as a finance lease if it would be treated as a finance lease in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice.