CA17000 - General: Avoidance: Balancing allowance creation
CAA01/S570A
Background
When the allowances on an asset are calculated separately there is a balancing adjustment whenever there is a balancing event. The allowances where this happens are IBA, ABA, FCA, MEA and ATA.
Schemes were devised to create or increase a balancing allowance
by artificially reducing the value of the relevant interest in a
building or unrelieved qualifying expenditure on a MEA asset before
it was sold etc. so that the balancing event would give rise to a
balancing allowance. For example, a company that owned an
industrial building would use the building as security for a loan
by giving the lender a charge on the property. It would then sell
the property to a connected company with the charge still there.
The charge would reduce the value of the relevant interest to a
nominal amount. The company could then claim a balancing allowance
equal to the qualifying expenditure not yet written off.
Legislation was introduced in FA03 to prevent this. The
legislation is in CAA01/S570A. It applies to ABA, ATA, FCA, IBA and
MEA.
Commencement
The legislation applies to all balancing events occurring on or after 27 November 2002 apart from events that occur in pursuance of a contract entered into before 27 November 2002. This exception does not apply to events that occur in pursuance of the exercise on or after 27 November 2002 of an option, right of pre-emption or similar right. The legislation applies to them.
Legislation
The legislation applies when you have a case where:
- there is a balancing event that gives rise to a balancing allowance, and
- the proceeds from the balancing event are less than they would otherwise have been as a result of a tax avoidance scheme.
If so, you should not make the balancing allowance.
A
tax avoidance scheme is a scheme or arrangement
the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of which is the
obtaining of a tax advantage by the taxpayer. A tax advantage
is:
- the obtaining of an allowance or a higher allowance, or
- the avoidance of a charge or the securing of a reduction in a charge.
When you apply the legislation calculate the residue of
expenditure immediately after the balancing event as if the
balancing allowance had been made.
Example Cass and Jack are connected. Cass owns an
industrial building. She agrees to sell it to Jack when the residue
of expenditure is £1 million. Before she does so she takes out
a loan of £1 million and uses the building as security. Jack
buys the building for £1,000, its market value because the
secured loan means that the building could be sold from under him
without his say so, if Cass were to default on the loan to the
third party. Cass claims a balancing allowance of £999,000.
The legislation in CAA01/S570A stops Cass obtaining the balancing
allowance but Jack’s residue of qualifying expenditure is
calculated as if the balancing allowance had been made. This means
that Jack’s residue of qualifying expenditure is £1,000.
When you apply the legislation to MEA you should treat the
disposal value as the proceeds from the balancing event and the
unrelieved qualifying expenditure as the residue of qualifying
expenditure.
