The residual value of an asset is the expected value of the
asset at the end of the term of the lease.
Operating lessors (and, rarely and to a smaller extent,
finance lessors) may be exposed to the risk that the residual value
is less than expected and so there is a market for guarantees which
reduce that risk.
The lessor may seek to guarantee all or part of the residual
value.
Where part of the residual value is guaranteed it can be the
top, bottom, or middle slice of that value. For example, if the
residual value is expected to be £1,000,000 the lessor might
take out a guarantee that will pay out if the value is less than
£750,000 (thus restricting his exposure to £250,000).
Alternatively, the lessor might insure the top slice of
£250,000, thus receiving compensation if the value falls to
between £750,000 and £1,000,000, but no compensation for
a fall in value below £750,000.
The middle slice may be insured with, for example, payout
being made if the value lies between £250,000 and
£750,000.
Paragraph 26 of SSAP 21 defines the ‘unguaranteed
residual value’ as that portion of the residual value of the
leased asset (estimated at the inception of the lease), the
realisation of which by the lessor is not assured or is guaranteed
solely by a party related to the lessor. The IAS definition in
paragraph 4 is essentially the same.
IAS 17 also defines the guaranteed residual value from the
perspective of the lessee and the lessor. The guaranteed residual
value is
Where the guarantee is entered into at inception it may make the
lease a finance lease.
A residual value guarantee entered into some time after
inception would not normally affect the classification of the
lease, but see
BLM22070 where the lease is a long
funding lease.