If the lessor incurs further capital expenditure on the
asset, it will not qualify for capital allowances as CAA01/S34A
applies to this additional expenditure as it does to the original
expenditure (by virtue of the existing CAA01/S571). In this
situation ICTA88/S502F applies to further reduce the lessor’s
income for tax purposes, to reflect the fact that further
expenditure has been incurred for which no relief would otherwise
be available.
The effect of this section is explained in the following
example.
Example
A plant or machinery asset cost £20,000. It is leased
out under a long funding operating lease for 15 years at a rent of
£1,300 per year and it is expected to have a value of
£5,000 at the end of year 15. The lessor incurs further
capital expenditure of £5,000 at the end of year 5 and
increases the rental by £600 a year. At the end of year 5, and
following the additional capital expenditure, the expected market
value at the end of year 15 is £6,000.
ICTA88/S502E
ICTA88/S502F
The end result – assuming no other changes – is that the lessor obtains deductions of:
| Years 1 – 5: | 5 x £1000 = | £5,000 |
| Years 6 – 15: | 10 x £1,400 = | £14,000 |
The total cost was £25,000 and a total of £19,000
is relieved. Assuming the asset has a value of £6,000 at the
end of the lease term that is clearly the appropriate result. In
practice, as the value is unlikely to be precisely as expected at
inception, adjustments are likely to be necessary when the lease
terminates, see
BLM41035.