BLM30210 - Taxation of leases that are not long funding leases: How tax advantages arise: timing differences - finance lessor, a worked example, part 2 of 4


In the example in BLM30040 the finance lessor is taxable (like the bank) on a profit of £20 at the end of the day, but the 25% capital allowances of £250 due to the lessor in Year 1 will create an upfront tax loss of £76. This is on a simplified calculation which assumes:

  • the total rentals of £1,200 are split evenly between the years
  • the 'interest' in and out is front-loaded in the usual SSAP 21 fashion
  • the 'other expenses' are slightly front-loaded
  • the asset is purchased at the start of Year 1.

This produces the following computation for the finance lessor for Year 1:

Gross rents receivable (£1,200 ÷ 5)£240
Less interest payable£58
Gross profit£182
Less other expenses£8
Net profit£174
Less capital allowances£250
Tax loss(£76)

The loss is recovered later and the overall profit of £20 is taxed, as the following tax computations for the finance lessor for the whole five years shows:



Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Totals
Gross rent2402402402402401,200
Less interest payable584532196160
Gross profit1821952082212341,040
Less other expenses8444020
Net profit1741912042172341,020
Less WDA and BA2501881411053171,000
Taxable profit (loss)(76)464112(83)20


The capital allowances for Year 5 assume a short-life election has been made and a balancing allowance is due on the worthless asset, thereby relieving the entire net cost over the 5 years.

With longer leases there are likely to be tax losses in the first few years. For example if the lease is over a 25-year term there could be tax losses in the first 6 or 7 years. Tax losses may be generated for longer periods by structuring the payment profile appropriately. The longer the period of losses, and the greater the delay in recovering the tax, the greater the timing advantage.