An amendment to a lease may, as a matter of law, create a new
lease.
Therefore you should review amendments to a lease to see if
it has created a new lease, whether or not the documentation
purports to show otherwise. The mere fact that the documents state
a new lease has not been created is not proof that a new lease has
not been created.
It is not entirely clear, in law, at what point changes to a
lease create a new contract (and so a new lease) rather than
amending an existing lease. You should accept that minor
amendments, such as making small changes to the lease rentals as a
result of incurring additional expenditure on the asset, will not
create a new lease, see example below.
Where there are more substantial changes you will need to
look at the facts before deciding whether the existing lease
continues or whether a new lease has been created. You should, of
course, also consider the consequences of the existence of a new
lease. The most obvious are that
If the amendment creates a new lease as a matter of general law
then you should consider whether the new lease is a long funding
lease in the normal way. The normal commencement and transitional
rules will apply to the new lease, see
BLM23000 onwards. If you think that a
new lease has been created as a result of modifications to an
existing lease you should seek advice from CT & VAT (Technical)
before entering into a dispute with the taxpayer.
The fact that a new lease has not been created (as a matter
of general law) does not preclude the creation of a new derived
lease, see
BLM20300. Where a lessor incurs
additional capital expenditure on the leased asset the provisions
of CAA01/S70L will create a derived lease if the additional
expenditure is on an asset of a different kind. No derived lease
will be created where the expenditure does no more than enhance the
existing asset.
The same principles apply, whether or not the existing lease
is a long funding lease.
Example
A lessor leases a locomotive to a rail franchisee in 2001. In
2007, the lessor incurs additional capital expenditure upgrading
the safety systems which are expected to last for the remaining
useful economic life of the locomotive. The lease rentals are
increased by about 10% to reflect that expenditure, but no other
changes are made.
The leased asset is the locomotive and the additions are not
sufficiently material to create a new lease of that asset.