IFRS recognises that issues may arise where an entity enters
into a transaction or a series of structured transactions (an
arrangement) with an unrelated party or parties that involves the
legal form of a lease. For example, an entity may lease assets to a
third party and lease the same assets back, or alternatively,
legally sell assets and lease the same assets back. The form of
each arrangement and its terms and conditions can vary
significantly. In the lease and leaseback example, it may be that
the arrangement is designed to achieve a tax advantage for the
third party that is shared with the entity in the form of a fee,
and not to convey the right to use an asset.
SIC 27 requires that where a series of transactions that
involve the legal form of a lease is linked they must be accounted
for as one transaction when the overall economic effect cannot be
understood without reference to the series of transactions as a
whole. This is the case, for example, when the series of
transactions are closely interrelated, negotiated as a single
transaction, and take place concurrently or in a continuous
sequence.
Extreme examples of arrangements that do not in substance
convey the right to use an asset and are therefore not accounted
for as leases are given in Appendix A to SIC 27. They include
Clearly, as these are extreme examples, this is by no means an
exhaustive list.
This is a complex area of accounting standards but could be
important, particularly where arrangements are entered into with a
view to gaining a tax advantage and the leases have little
commercial effect as leases (that is the making of assets
available) and are simply the means to another end.
Seek advice from your local advisory accountant if you think
SIC 27 is or might be relevant.