Businesses frequently expand by acquiring other existing
businesses. Where a trader acquires another business as a going
concern, depending on the facts, there are four possible
situations:
1. The new owner succeeds to the trade carried on the
previous owner (
BIM70645)
For this to happen:
Factors which would be relevant to establishing succession are:
But no one factor will necessarily be conclusive.
If there has been a change in the persons carrying on the
trade then the commencement provisions will apply to the profits
from the new business. If the new owner draws up a single set of
accounts for their old and new businesses, the profits will have to
be apportioned to enable this to be done. Unless the new business
is a separate trade from their old one (BIM70530) there will be no
need for any apportionment once the normal continuing basis period
rules apply.
2. The new owner begins a new trade in addition to their
existing trade (
BIM70530)
Factors which would affect whether there were two trades
after the acquisition are:
If the new business is a separate trade then the commencement
provisions (
BIM71045) will apply. The businesses
will continue to be assessed separately unless, as a matter of
fact, they are merged to form a single trade. If that happens, the
question again will be whether the combined business is a new one
or not (
BIM70590).
3. The new owner begins a single, completely new
trade (
BIM70595)
In this situation the acquisition of activities is on such a
scale, or brings about such a change to the nature of the old
business, that it means that the old business comes to an end. The
combination of the two businesses represents an entirely new trade
in its own right.
The commencement provisions will apply to all of the profits
from the new business and the cessation provisions (BIM71120) to
the old business.
4. The new owner simply expands their existing
business
If none of the three previous situations apply then the
acquisition of the business has no effect on the new owner’s
basis of assessment. The new owner is simply carrying on the same
trade as before, but on a larger scale (Maidment v Kibby [1993]
66TC137, is an example of this).