The cost of repairing a worn or dilapidated asset is normally an
allowable expense.
It is important to identify what is the asset that the work
has been carried out on.
If the taxpayer replaces the asset, that is capital expenditure
and not an allowable expense.
For example:
It does not matter whether the taxpayer chose to replace the
asset, or was forced to, for instance because the building burnt
down. The cost is capital expenditure and the whole cost is not an
allowable expense.
The question of what is the asset, the ’entirety' as it
is referred to, is one of fact and degree and a close study of the
facts may be needed. For more detailed information on what is the
whole of the asset or the ’entirety’, see the judgement
of Vinelott J in Brown v Burnley Football and Athletic Club Ltd
[1980] 53TC357 at p363 and the guidance at
BIM35330.
Depending on the facts, the taxpayer may be able to obtain relief for capital expenditure on the replacement of the whole asset in the following ways:
Some capital expenditure gets no tax relief at all. For example, expenditure on replacing commercial property such as offices and shops.