FA89/S43 defers to timing of the deduction for employees’
remuneration which remains unpaid nine months after the end of the
period of the accounts in which it is deducted in accordance with
generally accepted accounting practice.
In Dextra Accessories Ltd v Macdonald the House of Lords
decided that an employer’s’ contribution to a general
purpose EBT is a payment of ‘potential emoluments’
within the scope of FA89/S43.
The consequences of this decision are that a deduction for an
employer’s EBT contribution, if it would otherwise be allowed
for a period, is:
To qualify for a deduction a payment of emoluments need not give
rise to an income tax charge or NICs liability. But the onus is on
the employer to explain why the payment of the emolument is not
subject to tax deductions under PAYE and to employers’
national insurance contributions (NICs).
Where emoluments are received by employees in the form of
assets rather than money the amount of the emolument should be
taken to be the market value of the asset at the time it is
received by the employee.
Where the application of FA89/S43 to EBT contributions is in
dispute please contact CT&VAT (Technical) before any
arrangements are made for the case to be listed for hearing by any
body of Commissioners.